NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 676 to 690 of 2,627 results Save | Export
Razek, Joseph R.; And Others – Journal of Business Education, 1982
This article describes the results of a survey of the readability of most of the intermediate and advanced accounting textbooks currently in use at colleges and universities throughout the United States. (CT)
Descriptors: Accounting, Higher Education, Measurement Techniques, Readability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yu, Guoxing – Assessing Writing, 2009
This paper reports the effects of the properties of source texts on summarization. One hundred and fifty-seven undergraduates were asked to write summaries of one of three extended English texts of similar length and readability, but differing in other discoursal features such as lexical diversity and macro-organization. The effects of…
Descriptors: Familiarity, Writing (Composition), Undergraduate Students, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Nardo, Rachel – General Music Today, 2009
General music teachers have a technology tool that not only helps students sing better, it helps them read better! Carry-a-Tune or Singing Coach--the technology that received a rave review from former "General Music Today" technology columnist Kirk Kassner in 2005--is now being offered in an enhanced version called TUNEin[TM] to READING.…
Descriptors: Music Education, Music, Music Teachers, Singing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Blumenfeld, Warren S.; Justice, Barry M. – Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1975
Concludes that test results are essentially the same for both the Flesch and Gunning reading indices. (RB)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Elementary Education, Readability, Readability Formulas
Fry, Edward – 1989
The use of readability formulas is spreading into the courts and legislatures as one objective measure to protect the basic rights of citizens. Court cases and legislation involving the readability of Federal Government forms and correspondence, materials concerning criminal rights, consumer product labeling, ballot measures, and warranties and…
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Legal Problems, Readability, Readability Formulas
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Thomas, Georgelle; And Others – Journal of Reading Behavior, 1975
Analysis of variance applied to measured working times indicated that the Flesch takes significantly longer to use than Automated Readability Index and the Fog Count. (RB)
Descriptors: Measurement Instruments, Readability, Readability Formulas, Reading Level
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Muir, Sharon – Reading Horizons, 1978
Discusses the accuracy of the Fog Index and the SMOG grade (two readability formulas) as predicators of readability. (MAI)
Descriptors: Intermediate Grades, Predictive Validity, Readability, Readability Formulas
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Peterson, Lorna; Coniglio, Jamie W. – RQ, 1987
Library user guides from seven large academic libraries were examined for readability using microcomputer software for analysis. Results indicated that most guides are written at or above a reading level of grade 12. Appendices summarize readability formulas and depict in a composite graph the levels of all of the guides examined. (16 references)…
Descriptors: Academic Libraries, Computer Software, Graphs, Library Guides
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Koenke, Karl – Reading Teacher, 1987
Looks at ERIC documents that deal with readability concerns. (FL)
Descriptors: Elementary Education, Readability, Readability Formulas, Reading Instruction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Karlinsky, Stewart S.; Koch, Bruce S. – Journal of Business Communication, 1983
Found that standard readability indexes by themselves are not useful in measuring readability and comprehensibility of income tax material. Also casts doubt on the use of only readability indexes to measure insurance, labor, and real estate contracts. (PD)
Descriptors: College Students, Higher Education, Readability, Readability Formulas
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Maddux, Cleborne D.; And Others – Journal of Special Education, 1983
Twenty-four survey textbooks in special education, published between 1974 and 1982, were analyzed with formulae of R. Flesch to determine readability levels and human interest. Among results are that the texts are dull and difficult but usually complete in coverage, although some handicaps (e.g., severe/profound) receive scant coverage. (Authors)
Descriptors: Course Content, Higher Education, Readability, Readability Formulas
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Berndt, David J.; And Others – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1983
Obtained reading grade levels for depression scales by use of two empirically based readability formulae. Results showed Kovacs children's measure had the easiest reading level, the General Behavior Inventory was appropriate for college-level reading, and most other measures clustered at a fifth- to ninth-grade reading level. (WAS)
Descriptors: Affective Measures, Depression (Psychology), Readability, Readability Formulas
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Schultheis, Robert A.; Anderson, Roberta – Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 1982
McLaughlin's Smog Index was compared to the Dale-Chall formula for the determination of reading levels of 48 textbooks in business and distributive education. A Modified Smog Index proved a valid substitute for the Dale-Chall formula when used to evaluate the reading levels of business and distributive education narrative. (Author/CT)
Descriptors: Business Education, Distributive Education, Readability, Readability Formulas
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Blanchard, Jay S. – Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1981
The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory was analyzed by readability formulas which represent varying criterion of comprehension from 50 to 90 percent. If an examiner wishes to ensure 90 percent comprehension of the inventory items, nine years of successful schooling seem necessary. (Author/SJL)
Descriptors: Content Analysis, Difficulty Level, Personality Measures, Readability
Kennedy, Keith – Curriculum Review, 1979
After discussing the ease of using the Fry Readability Graph, the author applies it to biology, chemistry, and physics texts, and lists the results. He warns that textbook authors and classroom teachers should be aware of the potential impact that the reading level of a text can have on students. (KC)
Descriptors: Guidelines, Readability, Readability Formulas, Science Materials
Pages: 1  |  ...  |  42  |  43  |  44  |  45  |  46  |  47  |  48  |  49  |  50  |  ...  |  176