Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 19 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 157 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 414 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 883 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
| Al-Jarf, Reima | 7 |
| Pine, Julian M. | 7 |
| Cohen, Andrew D. | 6 |
| Dodd, Barbara | 6 |
| Ambridge, Ben | 5 |
| Chastain, Kenneth | 5 |
| Hammerly, Hector | 5 |
| Hendrickson, James M. | 5 |
| Rowland, Caroline F. | 5 |
| Bialystok, Ellen | 4 |
| Blom, Elma | 4 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 107 |
| Teachers | 47 |
| Researchers | 45 |
| Students | 2 |
| Parents | 1 |
Location
| China | 43 |
| Turkey | 35 |
| Canada | 34 |
| Saudi Arabia | 30 |
| Japan | 28 |
| Iran | 26 |
| Thailand | 25 |
| Spain | 22 |
| Malaysia | 21 |
| Indonesia | 20 |
| Australia | 19 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Does not meet standards | 1 |
Peer reviewedSheridan, James – CALICO Journal, 1983
Considering the computer as a collaborator rather than a machine, it is encouraged that those in the humanities and the arts fields take advantage of the great potential that artificial intelligence can offer. Stresses that unless deliberately restricted, the computer is an inherently interdisciplinary medium, and capable of interacting with any…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Instruction, Creative Activities, Error Analysis (Language), Humanities
Peer reviewedHulstijn, Jan H.; Hulstijn, Wouter – Language Learning, 1984
Investigates the influence of time pressure and focus of attention on the correct use of two Dutch word order rules in the speech of 32 adult learners of the language. The relation between explicitness of rule knowledge, assessed in an interview, and rule application, elicited in the experiment, is also discussed. (EKN)
Descriptors: Dutch, Error Analysis (Language), Language Research, Linguistic Competence
Peer reviewedDommergues, Jean-Yves; Lane, Harlan – Language Learning, 1976
Describes a study of "analogy" and "interference" errors in the syntax of second language learners. (Author/RM)
Descriptors: Error Analysis (Language), Error Patterns, Interference (Language), Language Research
Peer reviewedRoy, Mira – English Language Teaching Journal, 1975
A classification of a number of common errors in English pronunciation committed by Bengali learners. (RM)
Descriptors: Bengali, English (Second Language), Error Analysis (Language), Interference (Language)
Peer reviewedBulwa, Lillian – ADFL Bulletin, 1983
Presents four chief categories of common mistakes in French along with some of their causes and cures. (EKN)
Descriptors: Error Analysis (Language), French, Higher Education, Interference (Language)
Peer reviewedSchell, Leo M. – Reading World, 1982
Argues that the results of oral reading tests may be interpreted as being more precise and reliable than is warranted and that the amount of error in the results of these tests may make them more variable than is typically assumed. Recommends ways to improve the interpretation of oral reading test scores. (FL)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Error Analysis (Language), Oral Reading, Reading Research
Peer reviewedHofler, Donald B. – Reading World, 1982
Argues that many spelling and pronunciation mistakes made by students are due to consonant cognates--two consonant sounds that are produced almost identically with the articulators except that one is voiced and the other is voiceless. (FL)
Descriptors: Consonants, Elementary Secondary Education, Error Analysis (Language), Phoneme Grapheme Correspondence
Peer reviewedPickthorne, Brian – Instructional Science, 1983
Provides overview of significant facets of Error Factors (EFs)--promoters of underlying confusion in learning--discussing main types of EFs, sources of EFs in learning contexts, factors influencing frequency of EFs, use of tests and exercises, and effects of EFs and their mistreatment. Forty-seven sources are listed. (EJS)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Elementary Secondary Education, Error Analysis (Language), Error Patterns
Peer reviewedEnsz, Kathleen Y. – Modern Language Journal, 1982
Presents study conducted in France to determine which errors typically made by French-speaking Americans (errors in pronunciation, vocabulary, or grammar) are most objectionable to the French ear. Concludes grammatical errors were rated least tolerable. (Author/BK)
Descriptors: Communication Skills, Error Analysis (Language), Foreign Countries, French
Peer reviewedDelisle, Helga H. – Modern Language Journal, 1982
Presents and analyzes two studies designed to test native speaker reaction to certain types of errors that speakers of English make when learning German. Aim was to establish the role of the medium, spoken or written, in evaluation of errors. Results show overall ratings of errors in written and spoken language are similar, although with…
Descriptors: Error Analysis (Language), German, Language Research, Native Speakers
Peer reviewedFagan, William T. – Research in the Teaching of English, 1982
Investigates the relationships between the occurrence of mazes (garbles, word tangles, or false starts), sentence complexity, and the use of connectives in 20 fifth-grade students. (HOD)
Descriptors: Coherence, Elementary Education, Error Analysis (Language), Grade 5
Peer reviewedWebster, A.; And Others – Journal of Research in Reading, 1981
Analysis of the performance of hearing impaired and normal hearing adolescents on a standardized reading test shows that the hearing impaired students attempted significantly more items than their hearing counterparts, but made more errors and significantly more errors that are classified as "nonlinguistic" in nature. (FL)
Descriptors: Adolescents, Error Analysis (Language), Hearing Impairments, Linguistic Performance
Peer reviewedWood, D. J.; And Others – Journal of Research in Reading, 1981
Analysis of the performance of hearing impaired and normal hearing nine- to eleven-year-old children on a standardized reading test shows that the hearing impaired children tackled significantly more test items than their hearing counterparts and made significantly more errors in achieving similar reading scores. (FL)
Descriptors: Children, Error Analysis (Language), Hearing Impairments, Linguistic Performance
Peer reviewedCox, Jerry L. – Canadian Modern Language Review, 1981
Discusses the theoretical foundations of both basic approaches to contrastive analysis, the predictive, "a priori" version, and the explanatory, "a posteriori" version. Analyzes problems in both approaches, and states that explanatory investigations must be divorced from "classical" contrastive analysis and used with a more realistic methodology…
Descriptors: Contrastive Linguistics, Error Analysis (Language), Error Patterns, Interference (Language)
Peer reviewedTardif, Cecile; d'Anglejan, Alison – Canadian Modern Language Review, 1981
Analyzes errors that characterize French utterances produced by native speakers of English to determine the degree to which various categories of errors interfere with oral communcation. Error analysis is based on the spontaneous reactions of French speakers to correct and incorrect versions of the same utterances. Pedagogical implications are…
Descriptors: Communication Skills, English, Error Analysis (Language), French


