Translanguaging scholars have debated whether dismantling boundaries between "named" languages is necessary for social justice in education. To explore this issue, we examined teachers' reported use of named languages or translanguaging in classroom activities. We used a survey as an interview protocol to compare the extent to which four primary teachers in different international settings implemented two types of bi/multilingual practices with a recently taught class: "translanguaging" to learn without regard for boundaries between named languages, and "symbolic valuation" of students' (named) home languages and languages of affiliation. Using the sociolinguistic construct of "indexicality" as a lens of analysis, we found that only sometimes do teachers describe attaching positive indexicalities (social, cultural, or political meanings) to dynamic translanguaging or to named languages, and only sometimes are these indexicalities egalitarian--suggesting that the answer to the debate lies in positionings teachers create while marshalling translanguaging or named languages to manage classroom identities.