Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 27 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 113 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 280 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 517 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 248 |
| Researchers | 220 |
| Teachers | 81 |
| Administrators | 35 |
| Policymakers | 34 |
| Parents | 15 |
| Counselors | 13 |
| Students | 5 |
| Community | 3 |
| Support Staff | 2 |
Location
| Canada | 52 |
| Australia | 45 |
| California | 44 |
| United Kingdom | 37 |
| United States | 36 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 31 |
| China | 29 |
| Netherlands | 26 |
| Florida | 25 |
| New York | 25 |
| United Kingdom (Great Britain) | 24 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 1 |
Siskind, Theresa G. – Diagnostique, 1993
This survey on modifications allowed for students with disabilities by 30 states in statewide criterion-referenced testing programs found no universal agreement about modifications. Accommodations in Test Setting and Test Scheduling were more frequently allowed than revisions in Test Directions or Test Format. Assistance devices and accommodations…
Descriptors: Assistive Devices (for Disabled), Criterion Referenced Tests, Disabilities, Standardized Tests
Peer reviewedBarrett, Gerald V.; Depinet, Robert L. – American Psychologist, 1991
Examines five themes in "Testing for Competence Rather than for "Intelligence" (D. C. McClelland, "American Psychologist," 1973), and reviews relevant literature. Despite wide acceptance of McClelland's views, other evidence that does not show that competency testing surpasses cognitive ability testing in predicting…
Descriptors: Ability, Aptitude Tests, Cognitive Tests, Intelligence
Peer reviewedGross, Leon J. – Journal of Optometric Education, 1991
Many state optometric licensing boards require a scaled or percentage score of 75 on each section. A study of multiple criteria and pass-fail rates suggests that high failure rates are a result not of candidate ability but of arbitrary classification of test content. State boards are encouraged to resolve these problems. (MSE)
Descriptors: Agency Role, Failure, Higher Education, Licensing Examinations (Professions)
Peer reviewedGeisinger, Kurt F. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1991
Ways to use standard-setting data to adjust cutoff scores on examinations are reviewed. Ten sources of information to be used in determining standards are listed. The decision to modify passing scores should be based on these types of information and consideration of adverse impact or rating process irregularities. (SLD)
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Evaluation Utilization, Evaluators, Interrater Reliability
Peer reviewedRee, Malcolm James; Earles, James A. – Intelligence, 1991
Fourteen estimates were made of "g" (general cognitive ability) from the normative sample of a multiple-aptitude test battery with a weighted sample representing 25,409,193 men and women. The methods, which included principal components, unrotated principal factors, and hierarchical factor analysis, are equivalent for this test. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adults, Aptitude Tests, Cognitive Ability, Cognitive Measurement
Peer reviewedStobart, Gordon; And Others – British Educational Research Journal, 1992
Discusses gender differences apparent in British public examination entry patterns and outcomes. Questions whether examinations should be designed for equal outcomes and the assumption that assessment techniques may differentially affect performances of males and females. Argues that because other factors such as different experiences and…
Descriptors: Educational Opportunities, Educational Research, Equal Education, Foreign Countries
Peer reviewedNeill, Monty – PTA Today, 1992
National testing does not produce better education in other countries or spur students to do better work, and it creates barriers for poor and minority students. The paper recommends creating programs to help states and districts develop new ways to evaluate student learning as part of overhauling education. (SM)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Educational Improvement, Elementary Secondary Education, National Competency Tests
Peer reviewedKingsbury, G. Gage; Houser, Ronald L. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1993
The utility of item response theory (IRT) models in computerized adaptive tests is considered. Measurement questions that have been answered using IRT, and those that might be overlooked because of IRT, are reviewed. Areas in which fuller use of IRT could improve adaptive testing practices are identified. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Educational Assessment, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewedBangs, John – British Journal of Special Education, 1990
This survey of 34 primary schools and 5 local education authorities in Great Britain examined reactions to the pilot test of Key Stage 1 standard assessment tasks (SATs), as they related to special needs students. Teachers' criticisms focused on the overwhelming workload, questionable SAT reliability, and resulting decline in the quality of…
Descriptors: Elementary Education, Evaluation Methods, Foreign Countries, National Competency Tests
Kaniel, Shlomo; Reichenberg, Rivka – Gifted Education International, 1990
After describing deficiencies of psychometric tests in identifying disadvantaged gifted youth, this article presents a system of dynamic assessment and cognitive intervention. The program's theoretical rationale is based on systematic thinking and metacognitive skills. Objectives for program implementation are offered in terms of cognitive,…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Educational Diagnosis, Elementary Secondary Education, Gifted Disadvantaged
Peer reviewedMadaus, George F. – Harvard Educational Review, 1994
Historically, such testing programs as intelligence tests and Chapter I minimum competency testing have inadvertently perpetuated inequalities. An equitable national testing program must look beyond the mystique of testing technologies, clearly define purposes of assessment, recruit minorities into the testing field, and establish an independent…
Descriptors: Educational History, Equal Education, Intelligence Tests, Minority Groups
Peer reviewedJames, Julia Carol; Tanner, C. Kenneth – Journal of Research and Development in Education, 1993
Examines the desirability of standardized testing during early childhood education. The paper raises questions concerning the dangers of testing at too early an age. It is recommended that measures and procedures for developmentally appropriate assessment be developed to avoid unnecessary punishment of young children. (GLR)
Descriptors: Curriculum Development, Early Childhood Education, High Risk Students, Kindergarten Children
Peer reviewedCheek, Dennis W. – Middle School Journal, 1993
Testing is a technology, a socially mediated, value-laden endeavor. Technologies embody trade-offs between what is desired and real-world constraints of cost, time, thought, and energy. Although alternative assessments offer exciting prospects for middle schools, these new forms must not be misused or naively accepted as defensible, consummate…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Alternative Assessment, Educational Technology, Intermediate Grades
Peer reviewedLam, Tony C. M. – Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 1993
Describes testability of language-minority students as likelihood of language-minority students meeting five test assumptions necessary for valid scores. Discusses strategies for ensuring and enhancing testability. Explains how state departments of education and school districts use two sets of criteria to exempt language-minority students from…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Elementary School Students, Elementary Secondary Education, English (Second Language)
Peer reviewedSykes, Robert C.; Ito, Kyoko; Fitzpatrick, Anne R.; Ercikan, Kadriye – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1997
The five chapters of this report provide resources that deal with the validity, generalizability, comparability, performance standards, and fairness, equity, and bias of performance assessments. The book is written for experienced educational measurement practitioners, although an extensive familiarity with performance assessment is not required.…
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Measurement Techniques, Performance Based Assessment, Standards


