Publication Date
In 2025 | 4 |
Since 2024 | 16 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 51 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 152 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 210 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
Practitioners | 61 |
Teachers | 35 |
Researchers | 16 |
Administrators | 8 |
Media Staff | 4 |
Students | 1 |
Location
Canada | 8 |
Turkey | 8 |
California | 6 |
China | 6 |
Indonesia | 6 |
United Kingdom | 6 |
United States | 5 |
Australia | 4 |
Iran | 4 |
Texas | 4 |
Japan | 3 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Individuals with Disabilities… | 2 |
Americans with Disabilities… | 1 |
Bill of Rights | 1 |
Rehabilitation Act 1973… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Christie, James F. – Reading Improvement, 1978
Finds significantly more errors and a higher percentage of detrimental errors on passages composed of later appearing structures. Supports Goodman's view of the reading process (that reading is a "psycholinguistic guessing game"), and indicates a need for more sophisticated readability formulas. (RL)
Descriptors: Decoding (Reading), Error Analysis (Language), Miscue Analysis, Oral Reading

Miccinati, Jeannette – Reading World, 1978
Describes the development and the components of an instrument designed to assess the contents of educational materials. (JM)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Criteria, Instructional Materials, Measurement Instruments

Horning, Alice S. – Journal of Advanced Composition, 1987
Proposes that prediction and production variables used together tap both text and reader factors and provide a much improved analysis of readability. Finds that this kind of analysis will lead to more specific kinds of pedagogical strategies for teaching writing. (MS)
Descriptors: Cloze Procedure, Cohesion (Written Composition), Discourse Analysis, Higher Education

Burrill, Lois E. – NASSP Bulletin, 1987
According to studies using the Degrees of Reading Power system for estimating readability, most high school graduates cannot read at a level enabling them to understand much of what they read in newspapers, periodicals, work-related documents, or many high school texts or tests. (PGD)
Descriptors: Functional Literacy, High School Graduates, High School Students, High Schools

Turner, Edward C.; Algozzine, Kate – Clearing House, 1985
Reports findings of a study that examined the extent to which the variability observed in reading levels of common junior high textbooks was also present in four popular high school social studies texts. (FL)
Descriptors: Content Area Reading, Readability, Readability Formulas, Reading Diagnosis

Carver, Ronald P. – Journal of Reading, 1985
Argues that the Degrees of Reading Power test is not a valid tool for its main purpose, matching students to appropriate texts, because the test's units of text difficulty are not uniformly comparable to the test's units used to reflect a reader's ability. (HOD)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Readability, Readability Formulas, Reading Ability

Bormuth, John R. – Journal of Reading, 1985
Explains significant but accounted for factors that affected the validity of the Degrees of Reading Power Test. (HOD)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Prior Learning, Readability, Readability Formulas

Harrison, Colin – Journal of Reading, 1986
Examines the practical side of readablility in the United Kingdom as well as some theoretical considerations focused on research on text difficulty, microcomputer prediction of difficulty, validity of cloze procedure, and the effect when students rewrite textbook prose. (HOD)
Descriptors: Cloze Procedure, Foreign Countries, Layout (Publications), Readability

Rush, R. Timothy – Reading Teacher, 1985
Discusses the characteristics of three popular readability formulas: the Dale-Chall, the Fry Graph, and the Spache. Describes text based and reader/text based alternatives. Offers appropriate applications of each form of assessment. (FL)
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Elementary Education, Evaluation Methods, Readability

Dreyer, Lois Goodman – Journal of Reading, 1984
Suggests how teachers can make materials more comprehensible for students rather than relying on readability formulas for reading material selection. (AEA)
Descriptors: Readability Formulas, Reading Material Selection, Reading Materials, Secondary Education
Barchers, Suzanne; Pfeffinger, Charla – Teacher Ideas Press, 2005
After more than a decade in print, "Readers Theatre for Beginning Readers" continues to outsell all comparable books on Readers Theatre. "More RTBR" capitalizes on both the popularity of "Readers Theatre for Beginning Readers" and the emphasis on fluency due to the recommendations of the National Reading Panel.…
Descriptors: Scripts, Readability Formulas, Readability, Beginning Reading

Selzer, Jack – Journal of Business Communication, 1981
Doubts the ability of formulas to predict readability and questions their use as aids in writing readable prose. Points out that formulas also hamper the teaching of business writing because they emphasize written products instead of the writing process. (PD)
Descriptors: Business Communication, Business Correspondence, Higher Education, Readability
Harvey, Rhonda L. – Adult Literacy and Basic Education, 1978
Educators and publishers (including state departments) need to know the readability and usability of periodicals and non-text materials. On the basis of a research review of the relationship between intended audience reading level and non-text materials readability, author recommends state and federal agencies develop materials which meet the…
Descriptors: Adults, Communication Problems, Federal Government, Government Publications

Laroche, Jacques M. – System, 1979
The methodology used to determine readability of English texts (cloze procedure and word lists) is not applicable to foreign-language material. Linguistic variables are proposed as the basis for readability formulas. Contrastive and error analysis are possible strategies. (JB)
Descriptors: Cloze Procedure, Contrastive Linguistics, Error Analysis (Language), Language Instruction

Shymansky, James A.; Yore, Larry D. – School Science and Mathematics, 1979
Using the Fry Readability approach and a ten percent random sample of all reading materials from each grade level within a program, readability data were collected on six popular elementary science textbook series. Fry readability averages and ranges for the six programs surveyed are reported by grade level. (Author/MK)
Descriptors: Content Area Reading, Educational Research, Elementary Education, Elementary School Science