NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 421 to 435 of 667 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Carrell, Patricia L. – Reading in a Foreign Language, 1987
Reviews the literature critical of readability formulas as used in second-language reading contexts. It is suggested that such formulas not be used as guides to text production/adaptation or as measures of the difficulty of naturally occurring texts. (Author/CB)
Descriptors: Media Adaptation, Readability Formulas, Reading Instruction, Reading Material Selection
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Fry, Edward B. – Journal of Reading, 1987
Outlines the current uses of readability measures in education, business, and government. (SRT)
Descriptors: Business Communication, Computer Software, Court Litigation, Government Publications
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hague, Sally A.; Mason, George E. – Journal of Reading, 1986
Investigated whether the use of a computer and the desire to increase readability levels of their writing would encourage student writers to revise. Results indicated an increase in the readability grade level from original drafts to revisions. (SRT)
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Instruction, Readability Formulas, Reading Writing Relationship, Revision (Written Composition)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bradley, John M.; Ames, Wilbur S. – Journal of Reading, 1984
Describes the Luiten, Ames, Bradley Readability Variation Method for estimating the variation within a text. Concludes that it is practical and relatively accurate. (HOD)
Descriptors: Content Analysis, Difficulty Level, Evaluation Methods, Readability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bogert, Judith – Bulletin of the Association for Business Communication, 1985
Points out that readability indexes can serve a useful role in the teaching of writing when used as they were intended to be used. Focuses on Gunning's Fog Index. (EL)
Descriptors: Business Communication, Communication Problems, Higher Education, Readability
Noe, Katherine Schlick; Standal, Timothy C. – Computers, Reading and Language Arts, 1985
Suggests that common sense be applied when calculating text readability using a microcomputer. (CRH)
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Instruction, Computer Software, Elementary Secondary Education, Higher Education
Kennedy, Keith – Curriculum Review, 1985
Discusses history of the development of computer software to determine material readability and general design of readability software. Tables present summaries of: (1) parameters used by selected readability scales and their grade level applications; and (2) microcomputer software programs available, including readability techniques included in…
Descriptors: Computer Software, Costs, Elementary Secondary Education, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Davenport, Betty M. – Reading Horizons, 1986
Offers a case study of how one teacher used readability formulas to select the most appropriate materials for her students. Presents 10 suggestions that the teacher followed to avoid being tyrannized by the formulas. (FL)
Descriptors: Case Studies, Elementary Secondary Education, Readability Formulas, Reading Diagnosis
DuBay, William H. – Online Submission, 2004
The principles of readability are in every style manual. Readability formulas are in every writing aid. What is missing is the research and theory on which they stand. This short review of readability research spans 100 years. The first part covers the history of adult literacy studies in the U.S., establishing the stratified nature of the adult…
Descriptors: Readability, Adult Literacy, Readability Formulas, Reading Achievement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Johnson, Linda L.; Otto, Wayne – Journal of Educational Research, 1982
The possibility of changing the prosaic style of college level science textbooks to increase readability was investigated. Conclusions suggest that the readability of college textbook prose is not significantly affected by the stylistic factors employed in most readability formulas. (CJ)
Descriptors: College Science, High School Seniors, Higher Education, Readability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Froese, V. – Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 1981
Forty-two experienced teachers rated a set of reading passages by the SEER and the Rauding procedures. Findings indicated that the two procedures resulted in significantly different ratings, that teaching experience did not affect the rating, and that the SEER ratings agreed substantially with readability formula estimates of the same passages.…
Descriptors: Difficulty Level, Elementary Secondary Education, Foreign Countries, Readability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Austin, Joe Dan; Lee, Mary Ann Byrne – School Science and Mathematics, 1982
The relationship between content readability measures and mathematics test item difficulty was measured. An attempt was made to use readability to predict item difficulty. Results from the study are noted as somewhat discouraging, with only about 11 percent of the item difficulty variance explained by the selected readability measures. (MP)
Descriptors: Educational Research, Elementary Secondary Education, Grade 7, Grade 8
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Battison, Robbin; Goswami, Dixie – Journal of Business Communication, 1981
Surveys recent trends in the area of clear writing. Discusses the problem of incomprehensible language in functional writing (forms and documents). Considers solutions, particularly those developed by the Document Design Center. (PD)
Descriptors: Curriculum Development, Higher Education, Models, Publications
Williams, Pamela Perrigo – Florida Vocational Journal, 1979
Discusses the importance of determining the reading difficulty of vocational materials. Explains how to determine the readability of materials, using the FORECAST Readability Formula, presenting guidelines on how to select sample passages, apply the Formula, and analyze the data. An example showing the Formula's use is provided. (LRA)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Guidelines, Instructional Materials, Measurement Techniques
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
LaSasso, Carol – American Annals of the Deaf, 1980
Although the cloze procedure was shown to be satisfactorily reliable with deaf Ss, cloze scores did not relate to the predicted passage difficulty; therefore, the validity of the cloze procedure as a readability measure was not confirmed. (Author/DLS)
Descriptors: Adolescents, Cloze Procedure, Deafness, Evaluation Methods
Pages: 1  |  ...  |  25  |  26  |  27  |  28  |  29  |  30  |  31  |  32  |  33  |  ...  |  45