Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 5 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 53 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 155 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 553 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
| Hambleton, Ronald K. | 37 |
| Popham, W. James | 30 |
| Ediger, Marlow | 15 |
| Roid, Gale | 12 |
| Baker, Eva L. | 11 |
| Wilcox, Rand R. | 11 |
| Berk, Ronald A. | 10 |
| Haladyna, Tom | 10 |
| Livingston, Samuel A. | 10 |
| Millman, Jason | 10 |
| Nitko, Anthony J. | 10 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 255 |
| Teachers | 141 |
| Researchers | 99 |
| Administrators | 31 |
| Policymakers | 17 |
| Parents | 13 |
| Community | 9 |
| Students | 6 |
| Counselors | 2 |
| Support Staff | 1 |
Location
| Georgia | 85 |
| Australia | 50 |
| Florida | 36 |
| Missouri | 31 |
| Texas | 28 |
| Canada | 24 |
| Oklahoma | 18 |
| Illinois | 17 |
| United States | 17 |
| South Carolina | 16 |
| California | 15 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Does not meet standards | 5 |
Peer reviewedHunt, J. McVicker – Educational Theory, 1975
Descriptors: Child Development, Child Rearing, Criterion Referenced Tests, Educational History
Hunt, D.; Randhawa, B. S. – Saskatchewan Journal of Educational Research and Development, 1976
The concept of criterion referenced testing is examined and compared with that of norm referenced testing in terms of statistical translation problems and the relative merits of both testing concepts. (JC)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Concept Formation, Criterion Referenced Tests, Measurement Objectives
Nevada State Dept. of Education, Carson City. – 2003
The Nevada Criterion Referenced Tests (CRT) mandated by legislation are designed to provide a means of measuring student academic achievement and proficiency in the Nevada State Content and Performance Standards. This review guide is intended to be used by teachers and administrators as a tool to complement current efforts at preparing students…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Criterion Referenced Tests, Elementary Education, State Programs
Peer reviewedMillman, Jason – Review of Educational Research, 1973
Procedures for establishing standards and determining the number of items needed in criterion referenced measures were reviewed. Discussion of setting a passing score was organized around: performance of others, item content, educational consequences, psychological and financial costs, and error due to guessing and item sampling. (Author)
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Educational Research, Literature Reviews, Measurement Techniques
Hauenstein, A. Dean – Man/Society/Technology--A Journal of Industrial Arts Education, 1973
Descriptors: Behavioral Objectives, Criterion Referenced Tests, Curriculum Development, Curriculum Evaluation
Burns, Richard W. – Educational Technology, 1972
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Achievement Tests, Behavioral Objectives, Criterion Referenced Tests
Peer reviewedDeRose, James V. – Science Teacher, 1972
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Evaluation, Grade 7, Individualized Instruction
Peer reviewedAnderson, Richard C.; And Others – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1972
Data indicate that performance is better when feedback is provided after, rather than before, the response. (MB)
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Data Analysis, Educational Research, Feedback
Koen, B. V.; Keller, F. S. – Journal of Engineering Education, 1971
Descriptors: College Science, Continuous Progress Plan, Course Descriptions, Criterion Referenced Tests
Haladyna, Thomas M.; Roid, Gale H. – Educational Technology, 1983
Summarizes item review in the development of criterion-referenced tests, including logical item review, which examines the match between instructional intent and the items; empirical item review, which examines response patterns; traditional item review; and instructional sensitivity of test items. Twenty-eight references are listed. (MBR)
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Educational Research, Literature Reviews, Teaching Methods
Peer reviewedMills, Craig N. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1983
This study compares the results obtained using the Angoff, borderline group, and contrasting groups methods of determining performance standards. Congruent results were obtained from the Angoff and contrasting groups methods for several test forms. Borderline group standards were not similar to standards obtained with other methods. (Author/PN)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Criterion Referenced Tests, Cutting Scores, Standard Setting (Scoring)
Zwarts, Michel A. – Evaluation in Education: International Progress, 1982
The increasing relation between domain-referenced measurement and its implications in instruction are discussed with the argument that construction methods available do not guarantee content validity which needs more attention to be effective. Two domain-referenced testing procedures illustrate construction and validity problems. (CM)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Criterion Referenced Tests, Educational Testing, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedCocks, Errol – Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 1982
As part of a broad exploratory research project, both norm-referenced and criterion-referenced measures were utilized as child outcome measures for a group of 49 intellectually handicapped children aged from 12 to 48 months who participated in eary intervention programs. Findings suggested that criterion-referenced measures are more sensitive to…
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Intervention, Mental Retardation, Norm Referenced Tests
Popham, W. James – Health Education (Washington D.C.), 1982
Health education researchers have occasionally used measuring tools inappropriately. Test validity and the use of criterion-referenced tests are discussed in view of this need to improve health education research. Also described are handbooks containing measuring devices for the use of health education researchers. (CJ)
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Educational Research, Health Education, Measurement Techniques
Peer reviewedvan der Linden, Wim J. – Psychometrika, 1981
Decision rules for assigning students to treatments based upon aptitudes or criterion scores are discussed. Popular procedures are criticized and a Bayesian approach is recommended. The effect of unreliability of aptitude or criterion scores is also discussed. (JKS)
Descriptors: Aptitude Treatment Interaction, Criterion Referenced Tests, Cutting Scores, Decision Making


