ERIC Number: EJ1486249
Record Type: Journal
Publication Date: 2025-Oct
Pages: 24
Abstractor: As Provided
ISBN: N/A
ISSN: ISSN-0141-1926
EISSN: EISSN-1469-3518
Available Date: 2025-04-29
Preservice Teachers' Assessment Decisions: Exploring the Role of Fairness Conceptions
British Educational Research Journal, v51 n5 p2450-2473 2025
Teachers' conceptions of fairness influence their approaches to assessment. Perceptions of fairness underpin how teachers legitimate their values and provide reasons for teachers to defend assessment decisions and actions. This study therefore examined fairness conceptions at a critical stage in teachers' journey towards assessment capacity: their perceptions as teacher candidates. Specifically, we investigated 228 preservice teachers' conceptions of assessment fairness using the Classroom Assessment Fairness Inventory (CAFI). The results of an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) showed four factors: "assessment communication acts," "grading decisions," "responses to cheating" and "firm assessment decisions." These factors highlighted the domains and underpinning principles of fairness that participating preservice teachers used to evaluate issues of fairness in assessment. The results provide initial empirical foundations to promote nuanced understandings of fairness in assessment education.
Descriptors: Preservice Teachers, Evaluative Thinking, Decision Making, Evaluation Methods, Student Evaluation, Grading, Cheating, Factor Analysis
Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www-wiley-com.bibliotheek.ehb.be/en-us
Publication Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education; Postsecondary Education
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A
Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A
Author Affiliations: 1Learning Sciences and Assessment Department, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore; 2Centre for Assessment and Evaluation, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore; 3University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; 4Psychology and Child & Human Development, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore; 5Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; 6Faculty of Philosophy, Sciences and Languages of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; 7Business Research Unit (BRU-IUL), Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (Iscte-IUL), Lisbon, Portugal; 8Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal

Peer reviewed
Direct link
