ERIC Number: EJ1483001
Record Type: Journal
Publication Date: 2025-Sep
Pages: 28
Abstractor: As Provided
ISBN: N/A
ISSN: ISSN-0036-8326
EISSN: EISSN-1098-237X
Available Date: 2025-02-01
School Science: An Approach to Rethinking What Students Learn and How They Might Be Better Engaged
Science Education, v109 n5 p1149-1176 2025
For decades, two critical challenges have plagued school science in the years it is compulsory for students in many educational contexts across the globe: how best to identify what science is meaningful for all students to learn during their formal school science education, and how to keep these students engaged in the learning of this science. Diverse science curriculum movements over these decades and throughout the English-speaking world have provided different conceptualizations about the science content and process students should learn, and suggested many pedagogical practices to engage students in that learning. However, the two intertwined challenges of specific concern for this article clearly remain: what science to include and how to foster student engagement with that science. In this paper, we first seek to provide insights relevant to these two challenges via reviews of extant research in three quite broad and important areas of scholarship: (a) the concepts of imagination and creativity, considered particularly through current cultural-historical approaches to early years science learning; (b) the long-standing support around the globe for a range of inquiry-based approaches; and (c) the German constructs of "Didaktik" and "Bildung" as existing paths from a non-Anglo context that assist the determination of choices of science for curriculum inclusion or rejection. We then consider how these three discussions can lead to considerations of school science curriculum that better address the two challenges. Though simple solutions for these complex and multifaceted challenges are unlikely and beyond the aim of this paper, interrelated aspects of our three discussions point to curriculum-focussed initiatives focussing on "big ideas" as a way to determine content. We conclude by briefly illustrating these considerations via the example of school science curriculum structured via the "big ideas" of science: that is, those that are argued to be fundamental to the learner over the course of their compulsory science education.
Descriptors: Science Education, Learner Engagement, Curriculum Evaluation, Science Curriculum, Core Curriculum, Elementary Secondary Education, Scientific Concepts, Fundamental Concepts
Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www-wiley-com.bibliotheek.ehb.be/en-us
Publication Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Evaluative
Education Level: Elementary Secondary Education
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A
Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A
Author Affiliations: 1Faculty of Education, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; 2School of Early Childhood Education, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece

Peer reviewed
Direct link
