NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 4,681 to 4,695 of 5,989 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Johnson, Basil G.; Beck, Hall P. – Teaching of Psychology, 1988
Determines the effects of strict and lenient grading practices on the test performance of students with low, moderate and high SAT scores. Concludes that variations in grading scales affects how much students learn. Suggests that the effects of teacher and course evaluations by students be mediated by considering students' performance. (KO)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, College Instruction, Course Evaluation, Educational Psychology
Manning, Maryann; Manning, Gary – Teaching PreK-8, 1995
Discusses ways that whole-language teachers can address the concerns raised by administrators, teachers, and parents about the use of portfolios in language arts classes. Suggests that teachers can use student self-evaluation and other methods to assign grades in portfolio-based classes, and master various techniques to reduce the time needed to…
Descriptors: Classroom Techniques, Criticism, Educational Attitudes, Elementary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Stone, Gregory Ethan; Lunz, Mary E. – Applied Measurement in Education, 1994
Effects of reviewing items and altering responses on examinee ability estimates, test precision, test information, decision confidence, and pass/fail status were studied for 376 examinees taking 2 certification tests. Test precision is only slightly affected by review, and average information loss can be recovered by addition of one item. (SLD)
Descriptors: Ability, Adaptive Testing, Certification, Change
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Mathematics Teacher, 1992
Two methods to facilitate classroom management and initiate student responsibilities are presented. The first describes student responsibilities for making up missed tests or assignments. The second describes a student scorecard to help students keep track of their grades and act as a motivational technique. (MDH)
Descriptors: Attendance, Classroom Techniques, Evaluation Methods, Grading
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Mathematics Teacher, 1992
Presents two ideas to help beginning mathematics teachers. The first presents a way to record and grade homework. The second suggests a manipulative to help students understand the trigonometric concept of reference angle. (MDH)
Descriptors: Assignments, Classroom Techniques, Evaluation Methods, Geometric Concepts
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Fairbanks, Paul J. – Mathematics Teacher, 1992
Proposes offering college students an optional performance contract that requires full class participation and resubmission of incorrect test items to alleviate mathematics anxiety. A comparison of students opting or not opting for the contract indicated that contracted students outperformed their counterparts in the latter stages of the course.…
Descriptors: College Students, Evaluation Methods, Grading, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Leach, Eilene L. – Mathematics Teacher, 1992
Describes alternative form of evaluation that enables the teacher to assign a grade to students problem-solving skills as they participate in a discussion to solve a problem. Discusses room arrangement, the role of the audience, grading, and secondary benefits of the method. (MDH)
Descriptors: Classroom Environment, Discussion, Discussion (Teaching Technique), Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Harper, Bena – ACA Bulletin, 1991
Presents research results regarding the use of graduate teaching assistants (TAs) in undergraduate courses. Reports that the use of TAs had no significant effect on grading. Reveals that students felt they learned no less in courses taught by TAs. Suggests that students preferred TAs, the courses they taught, and their attitudes about students.…
Descriptors: Attitude Measures, Educational Research, Grading, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Malehorn, Hal – Clearing House, 1994
Describes 10 methods of assessment that teachers can use alone or in combination: (1) multiple marking, (2) peer evaluation, (3) mastery learning, (4) contracted learning, (5) credit-no credit grading, (6) self-evaluation, (7) anecdotal records, (8) pupil profiles, (9) checklists, and (10) dossiers. (FL)
Descriptors: Educational Testing, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Grades (Scholastic)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Roy, Emil L. – Journal of Basic Writing, 1993
Presents research that validates and refines a computerized system for grading placement exams. Compares computerized ratings to holistic scores, grades earned in courses, and other measures. Calls for additional research on larger populations and greater numbers of textual traits. (HB)
Descriptors: Basic Skills, Basic Writing, Computer Uses in Education, English Instruction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Baylis, Francoise; Downie, Jocelyn – Academic Medicine, 1991
A survey of all 16 Canadian medical schools found that 15 provided some ethics education. Time allocated ranged from 10-45 hours per degree, with no discernible pattern of distribution across years. Most teaching was case based and issue oriented, most instructors were physicians, and most schools used a pass-fail standard. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: Curriculum Design, Educational Objectives, Ethical Instruction, Ethics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Swanson, David B.; And Others – Academic Medicine, 1990
This study is the National Board of Medical Examiners exploration of content-based techniques (standard-setting techniques in which pass/fail decisions are based upon the performance of examinees in relation to test content). Two content-based techniques (Angoff and Ebel) and three methods of evaluating examinee performance were studied. (MLW)
Descriptors: Content Validity, Evaluation Methods, Higher Education, Medical Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Smith, Karl A. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1998
College faculty can minimize problems in grading students' cooperative projects by carefully structuring the five basic elements of formal cooperative learning groups: positive interdependence; individual and group accountability; face-to-face promotive interaction; teamwork skills; and group processing. There must also be sufficient reason for…
Descriptors: Accountability, Assignments, Cooperative Learning, Evaluation Criteria
DeCoker, Gary – Phi Delta Kappan, 2000
Japanese teachers participating in a workshop activity shared observations about U.S. schools. Teachers saw American schools' disciplinary procedures as stricter and more punitive than their own, marveled at principals' visibility and students' attention to attire, and noted that strict grading practices conflicted with instructional creativity…
Descriptors: Comparative Education, Creativity, Cultural Differences, Discipline
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Pitt, M. J. – Teaching in Higher Education, 2000
Application of game theory to small-group project evaluation in higher education instruction finds that the best strategy for students wishing high grades may not be a strategy that promotes teamwork and cooperation. Suggests that putting students into groups may randomly disadvantage some students relative to others, producing serious unfairness…
Descriptors: College Instruction, Equal Education, Game Theory, Grading
Pages: 1  |  ...  |  309  |  310  |  311  |  312  |  313  |  314  |  315  |  316  |  317  |  ...  |  400