Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 112 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 602 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1396 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2565 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
| Guskey, Thomas R. | 30 |
| Townsley, Matt | 17 |
| Jung, Lee Ann | 13 |
| Brookhart, Susan M. | 10 |
| Johnson, Martin | 9 |
| McMillan, James H. | 9 |
| Prather, James E. | 9 |
| Blackburn, Barbara R. | 7 |
| Bloxham, Sue | 7 |
| Cheng, Liying | 7 |
| Follman, John | 7 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 468 |
| Teachers | 436 |
| Administrators | 98 |
| Researchers | 50 |
| Policymakers | 32 |
| Counselors | 25 |
| Students | 25 |
| Parents | 16 |
| Community | 12 |
| Media Staff | 1 |
| Support Staff | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| United Kingdom | 129 |
| Australia | 106 |
| Canada | 95 |
| California | 70 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 69 |
| Sweden | 66 |
| Texas | 55 |
| United States | 51 |
| Florida | 39 |
| North Carolina | 36 |
| China | 35 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedMcDaniels, D. K. – American Journal of Physics, 1973
Discusses on the basis of Ph.D. qualifying examination results, advantages of a discrete scoring system under which continuously graded answers are classified as either correct'' or incorrect'' with the cutoff placed at a bias level.'' Indicates that the discrete method is characterized by increased selectivity about the marginal students. (CC)
Descriptors: Achievement Rating, College Science, Comparative Analysis, Cutting Scores
Kirshenbaum, Howard – Teacher, 1973
Author holds that no educational research has ever shown that grades are helpful to children or to learning. He also lists eight major criticisms of the traditional grading system. (GB)
Descriptors: Classes (Groups of Students), Continuous Progress Plan, Grading, Nongraded Instructional Grouping
Peer reviewedPavan, Barbara Nelson – Elementary School Journal, 1973
Presents the results of a research survey comparing graded and nongraded elementary schools. (Author/RK)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Educational Research, Elementary Schools, Grading
Peer reviewedStallings, William M.; Smock, H. Richard – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1971
Although the pass-fail option proved to be popular with students, the faculty sample felt that it was being abused, and had somewhat negative attitudes toward the system. (AG)
Descriptors: Academic Standards, Grades (Scholastic), Longitudinal Studies, Participant Satisfaction
Peer reviewedJournal of Reading, 1972
Descriptors: Grading, Program Evaluation, Reading Materials, Reading Skills
Peer reviewedGomon, Audrey; And Others – Journal of Reading, 1971
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Grade 10, Grading, Independent Study
Weisse, Edward B. – Reading Impr, 1969
Descriptors: Corrective Reading, Developmental Reading, Grading, Group Instruction
Peer reviewedPotulicka, Eugenia – Higher Education, 1983
Material in research and writing skills was integrated into departmental curricula in a Polish university. The intent was to develop students' skills in analyzing the content, reasoning, and forms of technical literature, and simultaneously practice planning written assignments, defining terms, organizing bibliographies, and using footnotes…
Descriptors: Continuing Education, Essays, Foreign Countries, Grading
Peek, George S. – Improving College and University Teaching, 1982
An experimental program in jury grading of freshman composition at Arkansas State University, abandoned after charges of racial bias and infringement on academic freedom, is described and evaluated based on comparison of jury grades and standardized test scores. The consensus of instructors is that the method was objective and consistent. (MSE)
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, College Freshmen, College Instruction, English Instruction
Peer reviewedRedfering, David L.; Biasco, Frank – College Student Journal, 1982
Reviews the literature in volunteering as it relates to a university credit course for students volunteering in human services agencies. Discusses the development of the program, along with the advantages to students, agencies, and the university. (Author/RC)
Descriptors: College Credits, College Students, Experiential Learning, Field Experience Programs
Peer reviewedParkhurst, Ralph E. – Arithmetic Teacher, 1981
A system designed to provide workable mathematics enrichment to gifted students in a standard mathematics classroom is presented. Mathematical contracts are the main feature of this successfully used program. (MP)
Descriptors: Academically Gifted, Elementary Secondary Education, Grading, Individualized Instruction
Sykes, Barbara – CORE, 1979
Problems in grading and evaluating English compositions are discussed. Factors include methods of marking, reliability, prediction, characteristics of markers, and handwriting. The effect of time passage on evaluation criteria was determined by comparing essays written in 1922 with new ones written on the same topic (f=fiche number). (MH)
Descriptors: Elementary Education, Essays, Evaluation Criteria, Factor Structure
Friedlander, Jack – New Directions for Community Colleges, 1980
Compares full- and part-time community college faculty members with respect to the following indicators of teaching effectiveness: teaching experience, continuity of employment, degree attainment, selection of course materials, reading requirements for students, use of instructional media and support services, grading practices, availability to…
Descriptors: Community Colleges, Comparative Analysis, Full Time Faculty, Grading
Peer reviewedUlbricht, Kurt; Zimmermann, Peter – Higher Education, 1981
Problems encountered in testing in aerospace engineering courses in an accelerated technical program of a German military university are outlined. Four common grading procedures are compared, and the optimum length of written tests is discussed. (MSE)
Descriptors: Acceleration, Aerospace Education, Armed Forces, Engineering Education
Bayne, Sarah – Independent School, 1980
Low grades and papers overrun with corrections can discourage children from learning to write. Assuming children who write a great deal can become good writers, this article provides alternatives to grading: individual, weekly conferences; editing by peers; and use of an overhead projector. Praise and comments are considered a must. (DS)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Grading, Individualized Instruction, Informal Assessment

Direct link
