NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 4,126 to 4,140 of 5,989 results Save | Export
Caplan, Robert D. – Improving College and University Teaching, 1971
Role playing and peer ranking by psychology students. (IR)
Descriptors: Course Content, Grading, Higher Education, Laboratory Training
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Zuckerman, Harriet; Merton, Robert K. – Minerva, 1971
Quality control of scientific writing raises level of the student's subject choice, preparation, research, and the standard of the scientific journal publishing the paper. (IR)
Descriptors: Decision Making, Doctoral Dissertations, Evaluation, Faculty Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Jessee, William F.; Simon, Harold J. – Journal of Medical Education, 1971
Descriptors: Employment, Extracurricular Activities, Learning Activities, Leisure Time
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gibson, Madelyn Squire – Reading Teacher, 1971
Descriptors: Elementary School Students, Evaluation Criteria, Grading, Individual Differences
Dann, Douglas – Facility: The Journal of the Professional Counselors' Association, 1971
Introduction of a pass fail grading system holds forth the promise of a more enlightened perspective in education. Counselors can make significant contributions to this system if they prepare for those changes with the application of intelligent foresight and prudent planning. (Author)
Descriptors: Achievement Rating, Attitude Change, Counseling Effectiveness, Counselor Role
Conrad, Donald B. – Clearinghouse, 1970
Descriptors: Achievement, Curriculum, Diagnostic Teaching, Educational Diagnosis
Kositsky, Nate; Franken, R. E. – Psychol Rep, 1970
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Behavior Patterns, College Students, Educational Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Vogler, Stephen H. – English Journal, 1971
Descriptors: English Instruction, Grading, Individualized Instruction, Magnetic Tape Cassettes
Link, William R. – Independ Sch Bull, 1969
First of a two article section, "More Blacks, But Less Integration." The second article is Isn't This What Education is All About?" by Robert M. Sandal.
Descriptors: Admission (School), Black Community, Black Culture, Black Power
Fleury, Dale F. – NASSP Bull, 1969
Descriptors: Conferences, Course Organization, Curriculum Guides, Grading
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Laughlin, Mildred – Journal of Education for Librarianship, 1982
Surveys 35 library school professors to provide a summary of current practices in teaching children's literature. Course objectives, topics introduced, instructional methods used, and determination of final course grades are highlighted. Two references are listed. (EJS)
Descriptors: Childrens Literature, Course Objectives, Grading, Higher Education
Romey, William D. – Phi Delta Kappan, 1983
The elimination of traditional courses in favor of student-originated, self-graded projects in the Department of Geology and Geography at St. Lawrence University in Canton (New York) proved too radical for the entire faculty. The program eventually became two-tracked, offering students both traditional and student-generated learning situations.…
Descriptors: Earth Science, Educational Innovation, Grading, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hipple, Theodore W.; Bartholomew, Bruce – English Education, 1982
Shares successful strategies for encouraging future English teachers to think deeply and seriously--but not rigidly--about grading. (RL)
Descriptors: Classroom Techniques, English Teacher Education, Evaluation Methods, Grading
Roe, Peter J. – Francais dans le Monde, 1981
Discusses the fundamental principles of evaluation to show that the conventional approaches to testing have led to a situation where procedure requirements overshadow the objectives of the learning process. Advocates instruments that address realistic communication goals and states criteria based on the learner's need for continous, constructive…
Descriptors: Communicative Competence (Languages), Course Objectives, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Calliou, Sharilyn – English Journal, 1982
Describes a method of evaluating writing that encourages students to become writers and that rewards their compositions. Notes how the evaluation method examines four major characteristics of good writing: surprise, truth, detail, and depth. (RL)
Descriptors: Creative Writing, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Grading
Pages: 1  |  ...  |  272  |  273  |  274  |  275  |  276  |  277  |  278  |  279  |  280  |  ...  |  400