Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 112 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 602 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1396 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2565 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
| Guskey, Thomas R. | 30 |
| Townsley, Matt | 17 |
| Jung, Lee Ann | 13 |
| Brookhart, Susan M. | 10 |
| Johnson, Martin | 9 |
| McMillan, James H. | 9 |
| Prather, James E. | 9 |
| Blackburn, Barbara R. | 7 |
| Bloxham, Sue | 7 |
| Cheng, Liying | 7 |
| Follman, John | 7 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 468 |
| Teachers | 436 |
| Administrators | 98 |
| Researchers | 50 |
| Policymakers | 32 |
| Counselors | 25 |
| Students | 25 |
| Parents | 16 |
| Community | 12 |
| Media Staff | 1 |
| Support Staff | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| United Kingdom | 129 |
| Australia | 106 |
| Canada | 95 |
| California | 70 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 69 |
| Sweden | 66 |
| Texas | 55 |
| United States | 51 |
| Florida | 39 |
| North Carolina | 36 |
| China | 35 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedSlotnick, Henry B. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1972
A principal components analysis was conducted to determine whether the measures of essays made by the computer could be grouped into factors. Six factors (fluency, spelling, diction, sentence structure, punctuation, and paragraphing) were identified. (Author)
Descriptors: Computers, Essays, Factor Analysis, Grading
Hunt, Richard A. – Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance, 1972
To overcome the many shortcomings in the present single grade system, a grading system is proposed that will allow separate reports with different reference points. (Author)
Descriptors: Academic Records, Achievement Rating, Class Average, Feedback
Peer reviewedO'Connell, Jeffrey – Journal of Legal Education, 1972
Author suggests grades of HPD (High Professional Distinction), PD (Professional Distinction), PC (Professional Competence), MPC (Marginal Professional Competence), and DPC (Deficient Professional Competence) rather than traditional grading students. (HS)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Achievement Rating, Grades (Scholastic), Grading
Quann, Charles J. – Coll Univ Bus, 1970
More schools are applying a diversity of new grading innovations, with complete elimination of the failure concept as the emerging pattern. (Editor/IR)
Descriptors: Enrollment Influences, Grade Point Average, Grades (Scholastic), Higher Education
Conway, James A.; Dettre, John – Improving College and University Teaching, 1971
Descriptors: Achievement Rating, Goal Orientation, Grading, Higher Education
Peer reviewedGold, Richard M.; And Others – Journal of Experimental Education, 1971
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Educational Research, Motivation, Pass Fail Grading
Shea, John B. – Journal of Health, Physical Education and Recreation, 1971
Descriptors: Achievement Rating, College Curriculum, Educational Objectives, Grades (Scholastic)
Simon, Sidney; And Others – Phi Delta Kappan, 1970
A fictional account of the grading practices of a high school faculty. (MF)
Descriptors: Class Activities, Fiction, Grading, High Schools
Peer reviewedGibb, Gerald D. – Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1983
The phenomenon of "halo" effects in subjective grading was investigated. Two groups of three raters evaluated 20 term papers in introductory psychology. Term paper grades correlated significantly with course grades when information about previous academic performance was made available. When this information was not available, the…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Bias, College Students, Evaluation Methods
Yarbro, Richard C. – Tennessee Education, 1982
The study indicated that student teaching is an anxiety-producing experience but little difference exists between students taking it by pass/fail and those taking it by grade. Both tended to experience loss of sleep and appetite changes and higher anxiety levels when confronted with situations involving the university coordinator. (NQA)
Descriptors: Anxiety, Comparative Analysis, Grades (Scholastic), Higher Education
Peer reviewedMathematics Teacher, 1983
The first section promotes use of student notebooks in mathematics instruction as incentives for pupils to do daily work. Part two looks at a geometric interpretation of the Euclidean algorithm. The final section examines an open box problem that is thought to appear in virtually every elementary calculus book. (MP)
Descriptors: Algorithms, Calculus, Geometric Concepts, Geometry
Peer reviewedCooke, John; And Others – English in Australia, 1982
Reports on an experiment during which English teachers collected pieces of writing that their students had prepared for assessment and gave them to other English teachers for grading. (HOD)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, English Instruction, Grading, Peer Evaluation
Peer reviewedThurman, Richard L.; And Others – Educational Research Quarterly, 1982
Forty-five teachers of educable mentally retarded (EMR) students and 34 first-grade teachers rated their students' mathematical abilities on a seven-point scale. The EMR teachers rated their students significantly lower than did first-grade teachers, although they performed comparably on the Peabody Mathematics Readiness Test. (Author/LC)
Descriptors: Expectation, Grade 1, Grading, Mathematics Achievement
Peer reviewedSuddick, David E.; Kelly, Robert E. – Journal of Experimental Education, 1981
A comparison of student performance resulting from the transition from a pass/no credit to the traditional letter grade system indicated that the former system was not superior to the latter system. Academic performance was better in the graded system; academic standards were raised, particularly at the masters' level. (Author/GK)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Academic Standards, Comparative Analysis, Grades (Scholastic)
Steves, Susan – C.S.P.A.A. Bulletin, 1981
Provides a detailed explanation of evaluating the student publications staff by dimensional grading, a combined point system and contract approach that involves designing a set of job dimensions for each staff position. Outlines materials-management, performance, and attitude dimensions for six staff positions. (RL)
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Grading, High Schools, Job Skills


