Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 112 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 602 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1396 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2565 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
| Guskey, Thomas R. | 30 |
| Townsley, Matt | 17 |
| Jung, Lee Ann | 13 |
| Brookhart, Susan M. | 10 |
| Johnson, Martin | 9 |
| McMillan, James H. | 9 |
| Prather, James E. | 9 |
| Blackburn, Barbara R. | 7 |
| Bloxham, Sue | 7 |
| Cheng, Liying | 7 |
| Follman, John | 7 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 468 |
| Teachers | 436 |
| Administrators | 98 |
| Researchers | 50 |
| Policymakers | 32 |
| Counselors | 25 |
| Students | 25 |
| Parents | 16 |
| Community | 12 |
| Media Staff | 1 |
| Support Staff | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| United Kingdom | 129 |
| Australia | 106 |
| Canada | 95 |
| California | 70 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 69 |
| Sweden | 66 |
| Texas | 55 |
| United States | 51 |
| Florida | 39 |
| North Carolina | 36 |
| China | 35 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedDavis, J. Kent; Rand, David C. – Journal of Educational Research, 1980
Grades generated by self-evaluation of performance were often more generous than those generated by instructor evaluation. (JD)
Descriptors: Achievement Rating, Grading, Higher Education, Self Evaluation (Individuals)
Rossi, Michael J. – ABCA Bulletin, 1980
Describes a system for grading individual assignments that combines objective guidelines with flexibility for the instructor and gives students opportunities to earn positive reinforcement. Shows how the system allows for the addition or subtraction of quality points. (RL)
Descriptors: Assignments, Business Communication, Evaluation Methods, Grading
Redick, Sharon – Illinois Teacher of Home Economics, 1980
Mainstreamed students should be graded in terms of their growth rather than by comparison with nonhandicapped students. Fair evaluation procedures include determining terminal and enabling objectives; pretesting and functional assessment; monitoring progress; measuring achievement; and transferring the evaluation into a meaningful grade. (SK)
Descriptors: Behavioral Objectives, Criterion Referenced Tests, Disabilities, Grading
Bennett, Ian Charles; And Others – Research Quarterly, 1979
A precise grading system in physical education has a salutary effect on motor learning. (JD)
Descriptors: Feedback, Grading, Learning Processes, Perceptual Motor Learning
Peer reviewedFairbrother, R. W. – Physics Education, 1977
Proposes that college-level comprehensive science examinations in Great Britain include separate grades for the practical and theoretical sections of the exam. (MLH)
Descriptors: College Science, Evaluation, Grading, Higher Education
Gephart, William J. – Phi Delta Kappan, 1977
Presents the results of the "Kappan" survey on attitudes toward selected measurement statements. (IRT)
Descriptors: Administrator Attitudes, Elementary Secondary Education, Grading, National Surveys
Stephens, Larry J. – Educational Research and Methods (ERM), 1977
Describes a study showing that students in an engineering class in which assigned homework problems were graded did not perform better than students whose homework was not graded. (MLH)
Descriptors: Educational Research, Engineering, Engineering Education, Evaluation
Peer reviewedMcGann, Patrick – Composition Studies/Freshman English News, 1997
Examines how assessment is constructed and understood, i.e., some of the conflicting subject positions writing instructors occupy when in the throes of grading. Suggests that "teacher selves" affect the act of grading, but so too do the subject positions of "student selves," namely, unconscious and/or superficial factors. (PA)
Descriptors: Grading, Higher Education, Teacher Student Relationship, Writing Evaluation
Peer reviewedBlount, H. Parker – Educational Forum, 1997
Grades are value judgments. They are not essential for learning, and they are motivating only as an exchange medium in a system that requires them. They are not a necessary method of assessment or measurement. Grading engenders conflicts between objectivity and the humanity of teaching. (SK)
Descriptors: Feedback, Grades (Scholastic), Grading, Student Evaluation
Peer reviewedGuskey, Thomas R. – Educational Leadership, 1994
Researchers agree that grading and reporting are not essential to instruction; there is no best grading system; grading is inherently subjective; and grades have some value as rewards, but none as punishments. Types of learning criteria and practical grading guidelines are outlined, along with a brief history of grading practices since the late…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Educational Benefits, Elementary Secondary Education, Grading
Peer reviewedMahon, Robert Lee – Clearing House, 1996
Proposes a hybrid grading system for composition papers which combines numbers and letters (thus providing some objectivity while preserving flexibility) that awards points on a sliding scale (with substantial rewards for content and readability and more limited rewards for mechanics and format) and that helps students see how their papers were…
Descriptors: Grading, Higher Education, Teacher Student Relationship, Writing (Composition)
Peer reviewedMehring, Teresa; And Others – Reading Improvement, 1991
Examines the consistency of grade assignment by elementary personnel, finding wide variations. Shows greater consistency in assigning grades after training. (SR)
Descriptors: Educational Research, Elementary Education, Elementary School Teachers, Grading
Peer reviewedWeber, Alan – Middle School Journal, 1992
Provides some time-saving and purposeful evaluation strategies that can be used with various writing projects and reports. Explains 10 hints directed toward what to do while the student is still writing and 5 hints for grading writing. (11 references) (MLF)
Descriptors: Grading, Intermediate Grades, Junior High Schools, Middle Schools
Peer reviewedNemecek, Paul M. – Clearing House, 1994
Maintains that a weighted grading system may be more suitable in situations where traditional grading seems inadequate. Describes two categories of weighted systems: the multiplicative system and the additive system. (SR)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Grades (Scholastic), Grading, Student Evaluation
Peer reviewedHarkin, Patricia; Sosnoski, James – College English, 1992
Explains how a hyper-gradesheet works, and traces the chain of causes and effects from a student's performance to the establishment of a grade. Contends that such gradesheets remove the problem of the invisibility of student and faculty performances from which an evaluation is inferred. (RS)
Descriptors: Data Processing, Grades (Scholastic), Grading, Higher Education


