Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 112 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 602 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1396 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2565 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
| Guskey, Thomas R. | 30 |
| Townsley, Matt | 17 |
| Jung, Lee Ann | 13 |
| Brookhart, Susan M. | 10 |
| Johnson, Martin | 9 |
| McMillan, James H. | 9 |
| Prather, James E. | 9 |
| Blackburn, Barbara R. | 7 |
| Bloxham, Sue | 7 |
| Cheng, Liying | 7 |
| Follman, John | 7 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 468 |
| Teachers | 436 |
| Administrators | 98 |
| Researchers | 50 |
| Policymakers | 32 |
| Counselors | 25 |
| Students | 25 |
| Parents | 16 |
| Community | 12 |
| Media Staff | 1 |
| Support Staff | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| United Kingdom | 129 |
| Australia | 106 |
| Canada | 95 |
| California | 70 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 69 |
| Sweden | 66 |
| Texas | 55 |
| United States | 51 |
| Florida | 39 |
| North Carolina | 36 |
| China | 35 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Combs, Arthur W. – Colo J Educ Res, 1970
Some ways to make education more relevant to the students of today are presented and discussed in depth. (CK)
Descriptors: Curriculum Development, Educational Psychology, Grading, Relevance (Education)
Larson, Richard L. – NASSP Bull, 1970
Descriptors: English Curriculum, Grading, Nongraded Instructional Grouping, Writing (Composition)
Peer reviewedHuck, Schuyler; Bounds, William – American Educational Research Journal, 1972
It was found that graders who are neat writers are biased by the neatness of an essay, and graders who are messy writers are not influenced by this factor of essay neatness." (Authors)
Descriptors: Bias, Essay Tests, Grading, Handwriting
Peer reviewedReichert, Jonathan F. – American Journal of Physics, 1972
Descriptors: College Science, Evaluation, Grading, Homework
O'Brien, John C. – Impr Coll Univ Teaching, 1969
Fatuous "reasons and real reason are examined as they relate to curriculum and teaching. (Author)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Grading, Higher Education, Intelligence Differences
Peer reviewedCohen, Ronald D. – Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1971
After being trained in writing acceptable laboratory reports for 10 weeks during which all reports produced were graded, ninth grade students in an elective science course were as likely to complete all future reports when they were aware that only a random quarter of the reports would be graded as when all reports continued to be assessed. (AL)
Descriptors: Classroom Research, Educational Psychology, Grading, Learning
Stewart-Tull, D. E. S. – J Biol Educ, 1970
Summarizes a survey of examination procedures for Honours science degrees in the United Kingdom and Ireland. Presents data on the range of grades awarded to a simple set of essay answers when marked by instructors in different universities. (EB)
Descriptors: Biology, College Science, Essay Tests, Evaluation
Loveless, Eugene J. – Impr Coll Univ Teaching, 1970
Argues against emphasis on standard curriculum and makes suggestions for providing basis to increase heterogeneity of high level abilities of college students and for allowing highly talented but selectively developed students to gain appropriate training. (IR)
Descriptors: College Admission, Curriculum, Grading, Higher Education
Stallings, William M.; Leslie, Elwood K. – Impr Coll Univ Teaching, 1970
Students prefer a pass-fail system to letter grading. (IR)
Descriptors: Educational Testing, Higher Education, Pass Fail Grading, Student Attitudes
McIntosh, D. M.; Walker, D. A. – Brit J Educ Psychol, 1970
Descriptors: Academic Ability, Academic Standards, Educational Certificates, Grading
Dingledy, David P.; Patrie, Lawrence A. – J Chem Educ, 1969
Descriptors: Chemistry, College Science, Evaluation, Grading
NEA Res Bull, 1969
Descriptors: Achievement Rating, Evaluation Methods, Grading, Report Cards
Peer reviewedChandler, Harry N. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1983
The author reviews issues related to grading learning disabled students that may cause problems between special and regular education teachers. He suggests that too many regular teachers have confused and arbitrary grading policies and that a pass/fail approach may be a wiser alternative. (CL)
Descriptors: Grading, Learning Disabilities, Mainstreaming, Regular Education Teachers
Peer reviewedJacoby, Alyce M. – Business Education Forum, 1983
Describes a procedure in which students maintain daily records of the number of minutes available for typing per class and the number of usable lines of copy typed in that time. The method allows students to evaluate their own production work realistically. (SK)
Descriptors: Grading, Office Occupations Education, Secondary Education, Self Evaluation (Individuals)
Peer reviewedNash, Charles C. – Teaching English in the Two-Year College, 1981
Describes a system for grading student compositions that evaluates the central idea, support material, organization, expression, and literacy, as a supplement to written comments from the teacher. Contains a copy of the grade and comment sheet. (HTH)
Descriptors: College English, Grading, Two Year Colleges, Writing (Composition)


