The problem of climate change that emerged as a result of the rapid acceleration of science and technology necessitates humanity to take responsibility for a utilitarian approach to existence. Central to this responsibility is the recognition and re-evaluation of the fundamental guidelines that have ultimately disrupted the balance of human-nature coexistence. The article explores the issue of subjectivity and its evolution through pre-modern, modern and postmodern paradigms. Each paradigm reflects a distinct form of subjectivity, shaping its socio-cultural and ethical framework. The modern paradigm, for instance, is dominated by the rational subject, who opposes themself to nature, perceiving it as an object to be exploited. However, the modern paradigm simultaneously gives rise to its antithesis: romantic subjectivity, which emphasizes organic dynamism and interconnectedness. This romantic perspective serves as fruitful ground for fostering a non-utilitarian attitude toward the world and cultivating an eco-centric subjectivity. Such a subjectivity recognizes non-human entities as equal, valuable, and deserving of respect. The article argues that the development of this eco-centric mindset should be developed through the appropriate mechanisms of ethical and legal regulations, supported by peace education programs that will eventually foster the cultivation of cultures of peace.