Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 74 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 509 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1084 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2603 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 169 |
| Practitioners | 49 |
| Teachers | 32 |
| Administrators | 8 |
| Policymakers | 8 |
| Counselors | 4 |
| Students | 4 |
| Media Staff | 1 |
Location
| Turkey | 173 |
| Australia | 81 |
| Canada | 79 |
| China | 72 |
| United States | 56 |
| Taiwan | 44 |
| Germany | 43 |
| Japan | 41 |
| United Kingdom | 39 |
| Iran | 37 |
| Indonesia | 35 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 1 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 1 |
| Does not meet standards | 1 |
von Davier, Matthias; von Davier, Alina A. – Educational Testing Service, 2004
This paper examines item response theory (IRT) scale transformations and IRT scale linking methods used in the Non-Equivalent Groups with Anchor Test (NEAT) design to equate two tests, X and Y. It proposes a unifying approach to the commonly used IRT linking methods: mean-mean, mean-var linking, concurrent calibration, Stocking and Lord and…
Descriptors: Measures (Individuals), Item Response Theory, Item Analysis, Models
Virginia Department of Education, 2005
The purpose of this report is to inform users and other interested parties about the development, content and technical characteristics of the Virginia Standards of Learning (SOL) assessments. It provides information for the 2003 "SOL" cycle that comprises the fall 2003 and spring 2004 administrations. The report is divided into three…
Descriptors: Research Reports, Testing Programs, State Standards, Program Effectiveness
Peer reviewedWard, Murray – Mathematics in School, 1974
Forty questions, covering a wide range of mathematics, were asked of 867 ten-year-old students. A difficulty index, discrimination index, and ranking are reported for each question as well as teachers' ratings of the importance of each question. (LS)
Descriptors: Achievement, Elementary School Mathematics, Item Analysis, Mathematics Education
Peer reviewedPassmore, David L. – Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 1973
Descriptors: Cognitive Measurement, Individual Testing, Item Analysis, Measurement
Peer reviewedAngoff, William H.; Ford, Susan F. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1973
Several samples of black and white students were drawn from the 1970 PSAT administration in Georgia and studies for item x race interaction on both the verbal and mathematical sections of the test. (Authors)
Descriptors: Aptitude Tests, Interaction, Item Analysis, Performance Factors
Peer reviewedAndrulis, Richard S. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1973
Purpose of the investigation was to identify the underlying content and cognitive dimensions in a standardized achievement test in the area of life and health insurance. (Author)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Discriminant Analysis, Factor Analysis, Insurance Occupations
Peer reviewedWarren, Richard D.; And Others – Home Economics Research Journal, 1973
Descriptors: Attitude Measures, Cluster Analysis, Item Analysis, Rating Scales
Peer reviewedLewy, Arieh – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1973
The present paper called attention to the difference between discrimination among individuals and discrimination among groups and suggested that the intraclass correlation coefficient should be used in the process of item selection whenever one is interested in discrimination among groups. (Author)
Descriptors: Correlation, Data Analysis, Educational Discrimination, Educational Research
Mosel, I. R.; Souter, W. – South Australian Science Teachers Journal, 1972
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Biology, Educational Research, Evaluation
Peer reviewedHopkins, W. – Educational Research, 1972
Low scores reveal that perhaps the real need is to search for and experiment with completely new approaches in the hope of awakening cultural interests in many of our students for the first time. (Author/MB)
Descriptors: Cultural Background, Cultural Enrichment, Item Analysis, Measurement Techniques
Peer reviewedHartnett, Rodney T. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1971
Alternative scoring methods yield essentially the same information, including scale intercorrelations and validity. Reasons for preferring the traditional psychometric scoring technique are offered. (Author/AG)
Descriptors: College Environment, Comparative Analysis, Correlation, Item Analysis
Peer reviewedRenzulli, Joseph S.; Shaw, Robert A. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1971
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Item Analysis, Junior High Schools, Mathematics
Peer reviewedManosevitz, Martin – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1970
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Item Analysis, Personality Measures, Psychological Evaluation
Robinson, Lora; Seligman, Richard – J Educ Meas, 1969
Descriptors: Campuses, College Environment, Educational Environment, Item Analysis
Parker, George V. C.; Veldman, Donald J. – Educ Psychol Meas, 1969
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Individual Characteristics, Item Analysis, Personality Assessment


