Publication Date
| In 2026 | 3 |
| Since 2025 | 109 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 432 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 964 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2120 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 270 |
| Teachers | 104 |
| Parents | 97 |
| Researchers | 84 |
| Administrators | 59 |
| Policymakers | 56 |
| Counselors | 26 |
| Students | 11 |
| Community | 10 |
| Support Staff | 10 |
| Media Staff | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| Canada | 86 |
| California | 66 |
| United Kingdom | 63 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 56 |
| Australia | 54 |
| United States | 52 |
| Texas | 43 |
| Florida | 33 |
| Netherlands | 25 |
| Massachusetts | 23 |
| New York | 23 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 2 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 2 |
| Does not meet standards | 2 |
Peer reviewedBlaxley, Lynn; And Others – Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 1983
The performance of 90 children between the ages of four and six years on two language screening tests was compared with their performance on Developmental Sentence Scoring (DSS) to determine the accuracy of these screening tests in identifying language impairments. The Bankson Language Screening Test was generally accurate in the identification of…
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Diagnostic Tests, Disability Identification, Language Acquisition
Peer reviewedOzawa, Joseph P.; Michael, William B. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1983
The Ozawa Behavioral Rating Scale contains six items related to distractibility and nine items related to impulsivity. This validity study showed that the Scale shows statistically significant relationships with the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children--Revised and the Matching Familiar Figures Test and may be appropriate for identifying…
Descriptors: Attention Deficit Disorders, Behavior Rating Scales, Disability Identification, Educational Diagnosis
Peer reviewedGriffing, Barry L. – American Annals of the Deaf, 1982
The author summarized major variables for states to deal with in statewide planning efforts for the education of the hearing impaired. (Author/SW)
Descriptors: Disability Identification, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Hearing Impairments
Peer reviewedKirk, Samuel A.; Kirk, Winifred D. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1983
The author traces efforts to define and redefine learning disabilities (LD). The inclusion of children in LD classes who do not meet requirements of the definition is seen as a common yet dangerous practice. (CL)
Descriptors: Definitions, Disability Identification, Educational Trends, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewedPoplin, Mary S. – Learning Disability Quarterly, 1981
Problems with restricting learning disabilities to a range of mild handicaps are noted and five areas of controversy affecting severely learning disabled students are addressed: definitions, student characteristics, identification criteria, educational methods and technology, and educational services. (CL)
Descriptors: Definitions, Delivery Systems, Disability Identification, Educational Technology
Peer reviewedMcDonald, Ann C.; And Others – Mental Retardation, 1982
More than 85 percent of the physicians surveyed indicated they are the initial informants to parents regarding the existence of a handicap and the information is immediately presented after birth to both parents, including specific diagnostic labels, possible causation, prognosis, and resources for the family. (Author)
Descriptors: Clinical Diagnosis, Communication Skills, Disabilities, Disability Identification
Peer reviewedHarber, Jean R. – Journal of Special Education, 1981
The utility of the procedures special educators apply in making decisions about the identification of handicapped individuals has not been thoroughly studied. The paper examines the utility of diagnostic decision making from the perspective of receiver operating curve analysis. (Author)
Descriptors: Clinical Diagnosis, Decision Making, Disabilities, Disability Identification
Peer reviewedSchexnider, Virginia Y.R.; And Others – Child Development, 1981
Human and geometric forms were presented to 12-month-old male infants to determine if infants with a large number of minor physical anomalies would show different habituation than infants with a small number. Differences were found in dishabituation and in response decrement. (Author/RH)
Descriptors: Attention, Comparative Analysis, Congenital Impairments, Disability Identification
Hammerman, Susan R. – Assignment Children, 1981
Journal availability: UNICEF, Villa Le Bocage, Palais des Nations, 1211 Geneve 10, Suisse. (Author)
Descriptors: Community, Deafness, Developing Nations, Disability Identification
Peer reviewedHarber, Jean R. – Learning Disability Quarterly, 1980
The paper explores several issues which effect the accurate assessment of language and reading disorders and, thus, of discrepancy between expected potential and actual achievement. For related information see EC 132 758-768. (Author)
Descriptors: Cultural Differences, Disability Identification, Evaluation Methods, Language Handicaps
Kurtz, P. David – Human Services in the Rural Environment, 1980
Early identification of handicapped rural children is difficult due to the scarcity of rural preschools, medical and human services, and education about the handicapped. This article defines early identification, delineates its four steps and the significant and divergent approaches to it, noting advantages and disadvantages of developmental…
Descriptors: Disabilities, Disability Identification, Human Services, Intervention
Peer reviewedVan Camp, Sarah S. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1980
To better identify the auditory strengths of elementary school children, a test was developed using a pure tone approach with sets of signals. (SBH)
Descriptors: Auditory Perception, Diagnostic Tests, Disability Identification, Elementary Education
Peer reviewedTeska, James A.; Stoneburner, Robert L. – Psychology in the Schools, 1980
Results demonstrate that the second-level screening procedure is an effective method for ferreting out children in need of full-scale psychological evaluation to determine areas of handicapping condition and generation of appropriate services. (Author)
Descriptors: Cost Effectiveness, Disability Identification, Educational Diagnosis, Followup Studies
Peer reviewedLewis, Ian; Vulliamy, Graham – Educational Review, 1980
The authors critique the Warnock Report on Special Education for its limited focus, the nature of the evidence used, and its conclusions and recommendations about classifying and identifying students in need of special education services, which the authors feel deal too exclusively with psychological and medical issues, ignoring social contexts.…
Descriptors: Definitions, Disability Identification, Elementary Secondary Education, Labeling (of Persons)
Peer reviewedNorman, Charles A., Jr.; Zigmond, Naomi – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1980
Intake placement data were collected from the files of 1,966 students labeled and served as learning disabled in Child Service Demonstration Centers (CSDC) in 22 states. There appeared to be a lack of consistency in the characteristics of students labeled learning disabled. (Author)
Descriptors: Definitions, Demonstration Programs, Disability Identification, Elementary Education


