Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 97 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 420 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 952 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2108 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 269 |
| Teachers | 104 |
| Parents | 96 |
| Researchers | 84 |
| Administrators | 59 |
| Policymakers | 55 |
| Counselors | 26 |
| Students | 11 |
| Support Staff | 10 |
| Community | 9 |
| Media Staff | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| Canada | 86 |
| California | 66 |
| United Kingdom | 63 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 56 |
| Australia | 54 |
| United States | 52 |
| Texas | 42 |
| Florida | 33 |
| Netherlands | 25 |
| Massachusetts | 23 |
| New York | 23 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 2 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 2 |
| Does not meet standards | 2 |
Peer reviewedGense, Marilyn H.; Gense, D. Jay – RE:view, 1994
This paper offers guidelines to compare the characteristics observed in children with autism and blindness and those observed in children with blindness alone. It distinguishes between stereotypic behaviors (blindisms) in blind individuals and similar stereotypic behaviors of children with autism. A table presents typical behavior patterns of…
Descriptors: Autism, Behavior Patterns, Blindness, Children
Peer reviewedFinlan, Thomas G. – Learning Disability Quarterly, 1992
This study found that states with low percentages of students identified as learning disabled (LD) used a diagnostic method for determining a severe discrepancy, whereas few states identifying the most students used such a method. Use of a method to determine a severe discrepancy may reduce inappropriate labeling of students as LD. (Author/JDD)
Descriptors: Disability Identification, Educational Diagnosis, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedEaves, Linda C.; And Others – Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 1994
Cluster analysis of data from 166 children with autistic spectrum disorders revealed 4 subtypes with differences in behavioral and cognitive areas. The four subtypes include a typically autistic group, a low-functioning group, a high-functioning group (Asperger syndrome/schizoid), and a hard-to-diagnose group with mild/moderate retardation and a…
Descriptors: Asperger Syndrome, Autism, Behavior Development, Classification
Peer reviewedManjiviona, Janine; Prior, Margot – Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 1995
This study found that motor impairment levels of 12 Asperger syndrome children and 9 high functioning autistic children (ages 7-17) did not differ. Intelligence level was negatively correlated with motor impairment. Fifty percent of Asperger children and 67% of children with autism showed a clinically significant level of motor impairment.…
Descriptors: Adolescents, Asperger Syndrome, Autism, Children
Peer reviewedCoben, Sharon S.; Vaughn, Sharon – Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1994
A review of the literature on gifted students with learning disabilities concludes that the literature is presently unable to provide empirically based guidelines for identifying and serving children who are both gifted and learning disabled. Several key problems are discussed, including identification, characteristics, and intervention.…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Disability Identification, Elementary Secondary Education, Gifted Disabled
Peer reviewedArehole, Shalini; Rigo, Thomas G. – Roeper Review, 1999
A study examined whether electrophysiologic techniques could identify central auditory processing difficulties in 15 low-achieving gifted adolescents. Results found that P300-wave morphology was significantly poorer for the low-achieving gifted group compared to achieving gifted and nongifted typical groups, but was not different from those with…
Descriptors: Adolescents, Auditory Discrimination, Auditory Perception, Disability Identification
Peer reviewedMadaus, Joseph W. – Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1998
Presents an overview of a screening process developed by a postsecondary institution that has a comprehensive support program for students with learning disabilities. The steps in the process are outlined, as are the successes and limitations. Recommendations for programs that are considering adopting a screening process are provided. (Author/CR)
Descriptors: College Students, Diagnostic Tests, Disability Identification, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedMazzocco, Michele M. M.; Pulsifer, Margaret; Fiumara, Agata; Cocuzza, M.; Nigro, F.; Incorpora, G.; Barone, R. – Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 1998
A study of 14 males with fragile X syndrome, 12 females with Rett Syndrome, and 25 individuals with other developmental disorders found that among those with fragile X syndrome, none of the 11 who did not have a diagnosis of autism met the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) criteria for pervasive developmental disorder.…
Descriptors: Adults, Children, Clinical Diagnosis, Definitions
Peer reviewedPolson, Cheryl J.; White, Warren J. – Adult Basic Education, 2000
Adult basic education providers in 9 states (n=555) identified barriers to providing accommodations for students with disabilities: inadequate number of agencies for assessment referrals, lack of training, inappropriate instructional materials, ineffective assessment tools, and limited budget/staff. The lack of screening and interventions for…
Descriptors: Academic Persistence, Accessibility (for Disabled), Adult Education, Adult Students
Peer reviewedMcDaniel, William F.; Foster, Robert A.; Compton, David M.; Courtney, Audrey S. – Research in Developmental Disabilities, 1998
A protocol for screening the complex verbal, simple verbal, simple visual, and spatial working memory was tested on 125 persons with mild, moderate, and severe mental retardation. Results found the test discriminated well between levels of mental retardation, correlated reasonably well with IQ, and possessed relatively good test-retest…
Descriptors: Adults, Clinical Diagnosis, Disability Identification, Intelligence Differences
Peer reviewedLayton, Carol A.; Lock, Robin H. – Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 2001
This article discusses issues in the identification of learning disabilities in students with low vision and examines the academic performance of one 8-year-old student and the methods that his multidisciplinary team used to document a dual diagnosis of low vision and learning disabilities. (Contains references.) (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Case Studies, Disability Identification, Elementary Education, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewedWenner, George – Psychology in the Schools, 1995
Compares the capability of three kindergarten screening instruments to correctly predict which children (n=95) would be recommended for referral to remedial programs or for retention: a Piagetian-based instrument, a general screening test, and a language-specific screen. Although the Piagetian-based test had poor predictive qualities, both the…
Descriptors: Disability Identification, Kindergarten, Kindergarten Children, Predictive Validity
Peer reviewedLord, Catherine; Risi, Susan; Lambrecht, Linda; Cook, Edwin H., Jr.; Leventhal, Bennett L.; DiLavore, Pamela C.; Pickles, Andrew; Rutter, Michael – Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2000
Psychometric data are presented for 223 children and adults with autism, pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified (PDDNOS), or nonspectrum diagnoses who took the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-Generic. Within each module, diagnostic groups were equivalent on expressive language levels. Results indicate substantial…
Descriptors: Adults, Autism, Children, Classification
Peer reviewedChin, Christopher E.; Ledesma, Heloise Marie L.; Cirino, Paul T.; Sevcik, Rose A.; Morris, Robin D.; Frijters, Jan C.; Lovett, Maureen W. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2001
Concurrent validity of the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test (K-BIT) with the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition (WISC-III) was evaluated. Both measures were administered to 65 children (ages 6-7). Results suggest caution against using the K-BIT exclusively for placement and diagnostic purposes with young children with reading…
Descriptors: Concurrent Validity, Disability Identification, Intelligence Tests, Primary Education
Peer reviewedPrendergast, Susan G.; Lartz, Maribeth Nelson; Fiedler, Barbara Casson – American Annals of the Deaf, 2002
A survey interviewed parents of 77 children with severe to profound hearing loss while attending an educational program at an Illinois state residential school. The children had lower ages of identification than those reported in national studies and in an early study in Illinois. Delays in early intervention are discussed. (Contains references.)…
Descriptors: Age, Clinical Diagnosis, Deafness, Disability Identification


