Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Learning Motivation | 2 |
| Models | 2 |
| Student Attitudes | 2 |
| Writing (Composition) | 2 |
| Writing Exercises | 2 |
| Writing Instruction | 2 |
| Ability | 1 |
| Applied Linguistics | 1 |
| Bachelors Degrees | 1 |
| Blended Learning | 1 |
| Cognitive Development | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| ReCALL | 1 |
Publication Type
| Guides - Classroom - Teacher | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
| Practitioners | 1 |
| Teachers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Attitudes towards Online Feedback on Writing: Why Students Mistrust the Learning Potential of Models
Strobl, Carola – ReCALL, 2015
This exploratory study sheds new light on students' perceptions of online feedback types for a complex writing task, summary writing from spoken input in a foreign language (L2), and investigates how these correlate with their actual learning to write. Students tend to favour clear-cut, instructivist rather than constructivist feedback, and guided…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Writing (Composition), Constructivism (Learning), Computer Mediated Communication
Roellich, Carol; Carlson, Diana M. – 1983
Secondary school teachers can present the process of writing compositions simply and effectively by adopting three tools: the positive approach, the easy three-step analysis process, and the brainstorm outline. Using the positive approach, teachers first convince students that writing effectively is important to them--it gives them the power to…
Descriptors: Expository Writing, Learning Motivation, Models, Morale

Peer reviewed
Direct link
