Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Word Processing | 16 |
| Writing Evaluation | 16 |
| Writing Improvement | 16 |
| Higher Education | 10 |
| Writing Research | 10 |
| Writing Instruction | 9 |
| Computer Assisted Instruction | 8 |
| Comparative Analysis | 5 |
| Computer Software | 5 |
| Microcomputers | 5 |
| Revision (Written Composition) | 5 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Carnegie Corporation of New… | 1 |
| College English | 1 |
| Collegiate Microcomputer | 1 |
| Journal of Advanced… | 1 |
| Journal of Business… | 1 |
| Journal of Special Education… | 1 |
| System | 1 |
| Writing Notebook: Creative… | 1 |
Author
| Hawisher, Gail E. | 2 |
| Barker, Randolph T. | 1 |
| Boiarsky, Carolyn | 1 |
| Booth, Wayne C. | 1 |
| Collier, Richard M. | 1 |
| Dobrin, David N. | 1 |
| Fortune, Ron | 1 |
| Graham, Steve | 1 |
| Haas, Christina | 1 |
| Harris, Karen | 1 |
| Hayes, John R. | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 9 |
| Journal Articles | 7 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 6 |
| Opinion Papers | 4 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 3 |
| Guides - Classroom - Teacher | 1 |
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
| Practitioners | 2 |
| Teachers | 2 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Graham, Steve; Harris, Karen; Hebert, Michael – Carnegie Corporation of New York, 2011
During this decade there have been numerous efforts to identify instructional practices that improve students' writing. These include "Reading Next" (Biancarosa and Snow, 2004), which provided a set of instructional recommendations for improving writing, and "Writing Next" (Graham and Perin, 2007) and "Writing to Read" (Graham and Hebert, 2010),…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Formative Evaluation, Writing Improvement, Writing Instruction
Peer reviewedBoiarsky, Carolyn – Journal of Advanced Composition, 1991
Investigates the effects of word processing on student's compositions to untangle the seemingly contradictory findings of earlier research. Finds that students are increasing their fluidity and fluency while simultaneously failing to organize and focus their increased verbiage. (RS)
Descriptors: Freshman Composition, Higher Education, Word Processing, Writing Evaluation
Peer reviewedBooth, Wayne C. – College English, 1984
Suggests slyly that, while word processors may have increased writing speed, they cannot ensure improved writing quality. (MM)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Humor, Microcomputers, Productivity
Peer reviewedPearce, C. Glenn; Barker, Randolph T. – Journal of Business Communication, 1991
Compares undergraduates' handwritten reports with those written on computers for 10 precisely defined quality factors. Finds more similarities than differences, with 6 of the 10 tests showing no significant differences. Notes that this study does not support a general conclusion that basic writing quality will improve in computer written…
Descriptors: Business Communication, Comparative Analysis, Higher Education, Word Processing
Haas, Christina; Hayes, John R. – 1986
A study was conducted to replicate partially John Gould's study using more advanced machines and editors, and to test several of Colette Daiute's hypotheses about writing with the computer. Gould's study indicated that expert writers using text editors required 50% more time to compose on text editors than on hard copy, and the extra time did not…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Higher Education, Microcomputers, Research Methodology
Dobrin, David N. – 1985
Noting that composition teachers would like computers in order to facilitate the mechanics of writing, analyze text, and correct problems, this paper argues that classroom computer applications are limited because computers cannot analyze text the way a reader would. The paper first posits that readers look at text in terms of semantics and…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Instruction, Computer Software, Elementary Secondary Education, Higher Education
Teichman, Milton; Poris, Marilyn – 1985
To learn more about the impact of word processing on the writing of college freshmen, a 2-year study involving 320 students of average writing ability investigated whether (1) students using word processors write significantly better than those who do not; (2) manipulating and improving sentences on a screen affects students' awareness of grammar,…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Instruction, Freshman Composition, Higher Education, Learning Strategies
Peer reviewedPennington, Martha C. – System, 1992
A case is made against the educational application with nonproficient writers of "canned" feedback provided by text analysis computer programs marketed as grammar checkers and style analyzers. The feedback does not teach students. Alternative approaches for giving students feedback in the electronic medium are offered. (46 references) (Author/LB)
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Instruction, Computer Software, Educational Technology, Error Analysis (Language)
Hunter, William J.; And Others – Writing Notebook: Creative Word Processing in the Classroom, 1990
Reviews research (1) concerning the use of word processors in improving children's writing; (2) students' attitudes toward writing; and (3) how improvements in writing are measured. Notes that current research should not be accepted at face value. Argues that teachers should seek ways in which the availability of word processors can help students…
Descriptors: Literature Reviews, Research Utilization, Revision (Written Composition), Word Processing
Smye, Randy – 1987
Computer software style and usage checkers can encourage students' recursive revision strategies. For example, HOMER is based on the revision pedagogy presented in Richard Lanham's "Revising Prose," while Grammatik II focuses on readability, passive voice, and possibly misused words or phrases. Writer's Workbench "Style" (a UNIX program) provides…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Instruction, Computer Software, Computer Software Reviews, Feedback
Nickell, Samila Sturgell – 1985
One of the best teaching methods adaptable to the computer is the writing conference. The student and teacher meet at the computer and work with the piece directly on the screen. Holding writing conferences at the computer allows the teacher to get closer to the student's writing processes and to determine the stage or stages with which the…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Instruction, Microcomputers, Revision (Written Composition), Teacher Role
Collier, Richard M. – 1983
A study compared written texts produced by hand, by typewriter, and by word processor for differences in improvement in creativity and writing skills. Subjects included six college students--two with high creative ability, two with average creative ability, and two with low or weak ability. During a training period, the subjects were required to…
Descriptors: College Students, Comparative Analysis, Creativity, Expository Writing
Hawisher, Gail E.; Fortune, Ron – Collegiate Microcomputer, 1989
Discussion of the role of computers in teaching basic writers to write focuses on a study of college students that examined the quality of student essays produced with word processing versus paper and pencil, described the kinds of thinking evidenced, and investigated whether any differences were gender related. (20 references) (LRW)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Instruction, Evaluation Criteria, Freshman Composition
Hawisher, Gail E. – 1986
A study explored the effects of word processing on the revision strategies of 20 advanced college freshmen enrolled in a required writing course. Subjects were divided into two groups of 10, each of which alternately wrote a series of four essays on and off the computer. For each essay students submitted three drafts, which were analyzed for…
Descriptors: College Freshmen, Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Instruction, Content Analysis
Mirenda, Pat; Turoldo, Kirsten; McAvoy, Constance – Journal of Special Education Technology, 2006
This study examined the impact of a word prediction software program, Co:Writer, on the written output of 24 students with physical disabilities that affected their ability to write by hand. Surveys were completed by both students who used Co:Writer and their teachers/adult supporters in schools, and 10-minute writing samples were obtained from…
Descriptors: Prediction, Educational Technology, Computer Software, Word Processing
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1 | 2
Direct link
