Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
| Essays | 3 |
| Predictor Variables | 3 |
| Revision (Written Composition) | 3 |
| Scores | 3 |
| Writing Evaluation | 3 |
| Automation | 2 |
| Computer Software | 2 |
| Elementary School Students | 2 |
| Essay Tests | 2 |
| Feedback (Response) | 2 |
| Program Implementation | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Beard, Gaysha | 2 |
| Huang, Yue | 2 |
| MacArthur, Charles A. | 2 |
| Palermo, Corey | 2 |
| Wilson, Joshua | 2 |
| Litman, Diane | 1 |
| Zhang, Fan | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 3 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 2 |
| High Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Wilson, Joshua; Huang, Yue; Palermo, Corey; Beard, Gaysha; MacArthur, Charles A. – International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2021
This study examined a naturalistic, districtwide implementation of an automated writing evaluation (AWE) software program called "MI Write" in elementary schools. We specifically examined the degree to which aspects of MI Write were implemented, teacher and student attitudes towards MI Write, and whether MI Write usage along with other…
Descriptors: Automation, Writing Evaluation, Feedback (Response), Computer Software
Wilson, Joshua; Huang, Yue; Palermo, Corey; Beard, Gaysha; MacArthur, Charles A. – Grantee Submission, 2021
This study examined a naturalistic, districtwide implementation of an automated writing evaluation (AWE) software program called "MI Write" in elementary schools. We specifically examined the degree to which aspects of MI Write were implemented, teacher and student attitudes towards MI Write, and whether MI Write usage along with other…
Descriptors: Automation, Writing Evaluation, Feedback (Response), Computer Software
Zhang, Fan; Litman, Diane – Grantee Submission, 2015
This paper explores the annotation and classification of students' revision behaviors in argumentative writing. A sentence-level revision schema is proposed to capture why and how students make revisions. Based on the proposed schema, a small corpus of student essays and revisions was annotated. Studies show that manual annotation is reliable with…
Descriptors: Notetaking, Classification, Persuasive Discourse, Revision (Written Composition)

Peer reviewed
Direct link
