NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Walker, Peter – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2016
Lexical sound symbolism in language appears to exploit the feature associations embedded in cross-sensory correspondences. For example, words incorporating relatively high acoustic frequencies (i.e., front/close rather than back/open vowels) are deemed more appropriate as names for concepts associated with brightness, lightness in weight,…
Descriptors: Sensory Integration, Intonation, Suprasegmentals, Phonology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Daniel, Reka; Wagner, Gerd; Koch, Kathrin; Reichenbach, Jurgen R.; Sauer, Heinrich; Schlosser, Ralf G. M. – Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2011
The formation of new perceptual categories involves learning to extract that information from a wide range of often noisy sensory inputs, which is critical for selecting between a limited number of responses. To identify brain regions involved in visual classification learning under noisy conditions, we developed a task on the basis of the…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Classification, Experimental Psychology, Cognitive Processes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Soto-Faraco, Salvador; Navarra, Jordi; Alsius, Agnes – Cognition, 2004
The McGurk effect is usually presented as an example of fast, automatic, multisensory integration. We report a series of experiments designed to directly assess these claims. We used a syllabic version of the "speeded classification" paradigm, whereby response latencies to the first (target) syllable of spoken word-like stimuli are slowed down…
Descriptors: Classification, Auditory Perception, Visual Perception, Syllables
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bigelow, Ann – Journal of Child Language, 1987
Examination of the first 50 words of three blind children revealed that the early vocabulary paralleled that of seeing children in terms of age and speed of acquisition. Differences between the two groups were related to factors which were highly influenced by experience (including visual experience). (Author/CB)
Descriptors: Blindness, Child Language, Classification, Comparative Analysis