NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 9 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Vainio, Annukka – Journal of Moral Education, 2011
The assumptions of Kohlberg, Turiel and Shweder regarding the features of moral reasoning were compared empirically. The moral reasoning of Finnish Evangelical Lutheran, Conservative Laestadian and non-religious adolescents was studied using Kohlberg's Moral Judgment Interview and Turiel Rule Transgression Interview methods. Religiosity and choice…
Descriptors: Social Behavior, Ethical Instruction, Adolescents, Moral Issues
Ohman, Johan; Ostman, Leif – Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 2008
This article aims to contribute to the debate about the moral and ethical aspects of education for sustainable development by suggesting a clarification of ethics and morals through an investigation of how these aspects appear in educational practice. The ambition is both to point to the normative dangers of education for sustainable development…
Descriptors: Educational Practices, Sustainable Development, Environmental Education, Ethics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Shweder, Richard A. – Child Development, 1990
The moral realism of everyday life is neither Piaget's childlike egocentrism nor Gabennesch's reification. Natural moral law is seen by Turiel, a cognitivist, as a code of harm, rights, and justice. Other cognitivists accept codes of duty and natural order. (BC)
Descriptors: Behavior Standards, Justice, Moral Development, Moral Values
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Helwig, Charles C.; And Others – Child Development, 1990
Moral judgments are an important aspect of social reasoning, not arbitrary products of social formations. Maintains that Gabennesch relegates moral concepts to reification, failing to account for the distinctions between conventionality and moral concepts. (BC)
Descriptors: Children, Ethics, Ethnocentrism, Moral Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Teo, Thomas; And Others – Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 1995
Examined the variability in the development of moral judgment by reanalyzing a set of Kohlberg's data studies on the concept of structured wholeness, a deep cognitive organization unifying different surface judgments given by the same subject. Although the results failed to show total consistency they also show that it is not meaningful to claim…
Descriptors: Cognitive Development, Individual Development, Interpersonal Relationship, Moral Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Saltzstein, D. Herbert – Human Development, 1994
Underlines two major differences between moral judgments and moral behavior. For behavior, the moral situation is construed from an observer's perspective after the event and typically involves conflicts between moral and other kinds of pressures. For judgment, the situation is interpreted from the self's perspective in advance and often involves…
Descriptors: Attribution Theory, Cognitive Development, Conflict of Interest, Decision Making
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Smetana, G. Judith – Human Development, 1994
Comments on the issues introduced by Saltzstein (PS 522 554) in this issue. Elaborates on Saltzstein's proposed social cognitive factors that may account for discrepancies between moral reasoning and action, highlighting strengths and weaknesses. (AA)
Descriptors: Attribution Theory, Cognitive Development, Conflict of Interest, Decision Making
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Colangelo, Nicholas, Ed. – Elementary School Guidance and Counseling, 1985
Issues of morality and children are examined. Information on moral judgment research with children is discussed with implications for educational interventions. Research suggesting that characteristics of moral dilemmas and solutions are related to sex and grade is presented. Areas to be pursued in research and practical application are…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Elementary Education, Elementary School Students, Ethical Instruction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McGillicuddy-De Lisi, Ann V.; And Others – Child Development, 1994
Investigated how children's decisions about allocating money to story characters were affected by the relationship (friends versus strangers) among the characters. Children's rationales for their decisions showed that equality was the most salient principle for decisions at all ages and that older children provided rationales based on benevolence…
Descriptors: Abstract Reasoning, Age Differences, Child Development, Children