Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 4 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 5 |
Descriptor
| Growth Models | 5 |
| Models | 5 |
| Value Added Models | 5 |
| Accountability | 4 |
| Cohort Analysis | 4 |
| Comparative Analysis | 4 |
| Computation | 4 |
| Correlation | 4 |
| Disabilities | 4 |
| Elementary School Students | 4 |
| Language Arts | 4 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Elliott, Stephen N. | 4 |
| Nese, Joseph F. T. | 4 |
| Schulte, Ann C. | 4 |
| Stevens, Joseph J. | 4 |
| Tindal, Gerald | 4 |
| Yel, Nedim | 4 |
| Anderson, Daniel | 3 |
| Matta, Tyler | 2 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 4 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 4 |
Audience
Location
| North Carolina | 2 |
| Arizona | 1 |
| Florida | 1 |
| Oregon | 1 |
| Pennsylvania | 1 |
| Tennessee | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| North Carolina End of Course… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full textSchulte, Ann C.; Stevens, Joseph J.; Nese, Joseph F. T.; Yel, Nedim; Tindal, Gerald; Elliott, Stephen N. – National Center on Assessment and Accountability for Special Education, 2018
This technical report is one of a series of four technical reports that describe the results of a study comparing eight alternative models for estimating school academic achievement using data from the Arizona, North Carolina, Oregon, and Pennsylvania accountability systems. The purpose of these reports was to evaluate a broad range of models…
Descriptors: School Effectiveness, Models, Computation, Comparative Analysis
Nese, Joseph F. T.; Stevens, Joseph J.; Schulte, Ann C.; Tindal, Gerald; Yel, Nedim; Anderson, Daniel; Matta, Tyler; Elliott, Stephen N. – National Center on Assessment and Accountability for Special Education, 2018
This technical report is one of a series of four technical reports that describe the results of a study comparing eight alternative models for estimating school academic achievement using data from the Arizona, North Carolina, Oregon, and Pennsylvania accountability systems. The purpose of these reports was to evaluate a broad range of models…
Descriptors: School Effectiveness, Models, Computation, Comparative Analysis
Reform Support Network, 2015
This publication summarizes the key discussion from experts in the field of measuring student growth during a convening held February 2015. Experts heard about two emerging approaches to measuring growth: Portfolios of student work samples and unit value-added models that provide teachers with timely and actionable feedback that they can use to…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Portfolio Assessment, Teacher Evaluation, Teacher Effectiveness
Stevens, Joseph J.; Nese, Joseph F. T.; Schulte, Ann C.; Tindal, Gerald; Yel, Nedim; Anderson, Daniel; Matta, Tyler; Elliott, Stephen N. – National Center on Assessment and Accountability for Special Education, 2017
This technical report is one of a series of four technical reports that describe the results of a study comparing eight alternative models for estimating school academic achievement using data from the Arizona, North Carolina, Oregon, and Pennsylvania accountability systems. The purpose of these reports was to evaluate a broad range of models…
Descriptors: School Effectiveness, Models, Computation, Comparative Analysis
Schulte, Ann C.; Nese, Joseph F. T.; Stevens, Joseph J.; Yel, Nedim; Tindal, Gerald; Anderson, Daniel; Elliott, Stephen N. – National Center on Assessment and Accountability for Special Education, 2017
This technical report is one of a series of four technical reports that describe the results of a study comparing eight alternative models for estimating school academic achievement using data from the Arizona, North Carolina, Oregon, and Pennsylvania accountability systems. The purpose of these reports was to evaluate a broad range of models…
Descriptors: School Effectiveness, Models, Computation, Comparative Analysis
