Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Content Validity | 2 |
| Validity | 2 |
| Classification | 1 |
| Concept Formation | 1 |
| Construct Validity | 1 |
| Debate | 1 |
| Definitions | 1 |
| Educational Research | 1 |
| Inferences | 1 |
| Interrater Reliability | 1 |
| Reader Response | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Educational Researcher | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
| Adult Education | 1 |
Audience
| Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkKane, Michael T. – Educational Researcher, 2008
Lissitz and Samuelsen (2007) have proposed an operational definition of "validity" that shifts many of the questions traditionally considered under validity to a separate category associated with the utility of test use. Operational definitions support inferences about how well people perform some kind of task or how they respond to some kind of…
Descriptors: Test Use, Definitions, Validity, Classification
Lissitz, Robert W.; Samuelsen, Karen – Educational Researcher, 2007
This article presents the authors' response to the discussants of their article "A Suggested Change in Terminology and Emphasis Regarding Validity and Education" (this issue)--Susan E. Embretson, Joanna S. Gorin, Robert J. Mislevy, Pamela A. Moss, and Stephen G. Sireci. Their response is limited to a brief summarization of their position…
Descriptors: Validity, Reader Response, Construct Validity, Content Validity
