NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Source
American Journal of Evaluation57
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Elementary and Secondary…1
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 57 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Michelle Searle; Amanda Cooper; Paisley Worthington; Jennifer Hughes; Rebecca Gokiert; Cheryl Poth – American Journal of Evaluation, 2024
Factors influencing evaluation use has been a primary concern for evaluators. However, little is known about the current conceptualizations of evaluation use including what counts as use, what efforts encourage use, and how to measure use. This article identifies enablers and constraints to evaluation use based on a scoping review of literature…
Descriptors: Evaluation Utilization, Evaluation Methods, Resources, Stakeholders
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tiffany Berry; Brittany Hite; Michelle Sloper; Haley Umans – American Journal of Evaluation, 2024
The research-to-practice gap describes the well-documented phenomena of researchers and practitioners working in silos, embedded in vastly different contexts. This "cultural divide" has several causes, including ineffective collaboration, inadequate understanding of context, and insufficient dissemination and translation of research.…
Descriptors: Theory Practice Relationship, Researchers, Evaluators, Coordinators
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hurteau, Marthe; Rahmanian, Jeiran; Houle, Sylvain; Marchand, Marie-Pier – American Journal of Evaluation, 2020
Expert intuition is increasingly considered to be a valid form of knowledge, and research has proven its effectiveness in judgment and decision making in various fields. Theorists seem to recognize the contributions of intuition within evaluative practice, but it has never been well-documented. This article presents a study on expert intuition,…
Descriptors: Intuition, Evaluative Thinking, Decision Making, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Grob, George F. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2018
This article is the fifth in a series on the relationship of evaluation theory and practice. It was commissioned by the Eastern Evaluation Research Society and the American Evaluation Association as part of The Chelimsky Forum, launched in 2013 to honor Eleanor Chelimsky, one of the most influential and respected program evaluators of our era, and…
Descriptors: Professional Development, Ethics, Evaluation Methods, Theory Practice Relationship
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Rohanna, Kristen – American Journal of Evaluation, 2022
Evaluation practices are continuing to evolve, particularly in those areas related to formative, participatory, and improvement approaches. Improvement science is one of the evaluative practices. Its strength is that it seeks to embrace stakeholders' and frontline workers' knowledge and experience, who are often tasked with leading improvement…
Descriptors: Capacity Building, Educational Improvement, Evaluation Methods, Public Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Christie, Christina A.; Lemire, Sebastian Thomas – American Journal of Evaluation, 2019
Many organizations now have evaluation policies. Because formal evaluation policies intend to frame evaluation practice, it is important to understand the aims of policies and their influence on practice. Evaluation theory is also intended to guide practice; therefore, the extent to which policies are informed by theory is also important to…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Educational Theories, Educational Practices, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mark, Melvin M. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2018
George Grob presented the fifth and final Eleanor Chelimsky Forum address at the 2017 annual meeting of the Eastern Evaluation Research Society. In this commentary, I respond to several points that George raises in the "American Journal of Evaluation" paper based on that address. An overarching theme of my comments involves the potential…
Descriptors: Theory Practice Relationship, Evaluation Research, Research Needs, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
DuBow, Wendy M.; Litzler, Elizabeth – American Journal of Evaluation, 2019
In a complex, multisite initiative, a well-developed theory of change can help an organization's leadership make strategic decisions about program elements, organizational direction and priorities, as well as provide structure and accountability for evaluation. This article describes the multistep process used by the evaluation team of a large…
Descriptors: Theory Practice Relationship, National Programs, Nonprofit Organizations, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Cooney, Siobhan M.; Feldman, Jill; Kelley, John – American Journal of Evaluation, 2016
Since April 2013, the Eleanor Chelimsky Forum has served as the centerpiece of the Eastern Evaluation Research Society's (EERS) annual conference. Eleanor Chelimsky (2012), a highly esteemed pioneer in the evaluation field, inspired the Forum in her 2012 plenary address (subsequently published in "American Journal of Evaluation"…
Descriptors: Theory Practice Relationship, Evaluation Methods, Evidence Based Practice, Intervention
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Scriven, Michael – American Journal of Evaluation, 2016
It is argued here that the general view, especially in the social sciences, of the specific status of evaluation is still deeply impregnated with completely absurd misrepresentations. A number of the worst are documented and refuted here, along with some suggestions as to their roots. It is stressed that the consequences of this tangled net of…
Descriptors: Evaluation, Misconceptions, Evaluation Methods, Social Sciences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Leviton, Laura C. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2014
Both speakers at the Eleanor Chelimsky Forum on Theory and Practice in Evaluation pointed out the complexity and messiness of evaluation practice, and thus potential limits on theory and generalizable knowledge. The concept of reflective practice offers one way forward to build evaluation theory. Building generalizable knowledge about practice…
Descriptors: Theory Practice Relationship, Evaluation, Reflection
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Feldman, Jill; Kelley, John – American Journal of Evaluation, 2015
In response to Eleanor Chelimsky's inspiring plenary address 3 years ago, and with generous support from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, the Eastern Evaluation Research Society launched the Eleanor Chelimsky Forum at its 2013 Annual Conference. The objective of this annual Forum, which has become a hallmark event in the evaluation world, is to…
Descriptors: Theory Practice Relationship, Evaluation, Best Practices, Theories
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Schwandt, Thomas A. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2014
The relationship between theory and practice, or between theoretical knowledge and practical knowledge, is not a simple one, and rarely is it the case that theory is "applied" to practice. This paper aims to clarify the relationship by briefly discussing the nature of practical problems and the role that theoretical knowledge plays in…
Descriptors: Theory Practice Relationship, Evaluation, Evaluation Problems, Evaluation Utilization
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Leviton, Laura C. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2015
Debra Rog presented the 2014 Eleanor Chelimsky Forum address, offering ways to integrate evaluation theory and practice by abundant use of practice examples. These examples illustrate the effective use of the Ladder of Abstraction from semantics, working from the concrete to the abstract and back again.
Descriptors: Theory Practice Relationship, Educational Practices, Integrated Activities, Demonstrations (Educational)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Coryn, Chris L. S.; Ozeki, Satoshi; Wilson, Lyssa N.; Greenman, Gregory D., II; Schröter, Daniela C.; Hobson, Kristin A.; Azzam, Tarek; Vo, Anne T. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2016
Research on evaluation theories, methods, and practices has increased considerably in the past decade. Even so, little is known about whether published findings from research on evaluation are read by evaluators and whether such findings influence evaluators' thinking about evaluation or their evaluation practice. To address these questions, and…
Descriptors: Evaluation, Surveys, Evaluators, Professional Associations
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4