NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20260
Since 20250
Since 2022 (last 5 years)0
Since 2017 (last 10 years)1
Since 2007 (last 20 years)2
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 16 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Vlaardingerbroek, Barend – Journal of Biological Education, 2020
Ernst Haeckel (1834-1919) is most recalled in the history of biology for his Recapitulation Theory and the allegedly fudged illustrations of embryos that he presented in support of that case. Less well known is his contribution to abiogenesis theory, which he incorporated into evolutionary theory. In so doing, Haeckel, a vitriolic atheist, was…
Descriptors: Science History, Microbiology, Evolution, Scientific Concepts
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
van Dijk, Esther M.; Reydon, Thomas A. C. – Science & Education, 2010
In this paper we present a schematic overview of the central concepts in evolutionary theory, setting them off against the background of widespread misconceptions about them. Our aim is to provide high school teachers with (1) an overview of those particular concepts that they can expect students to have difficulties with, (2) a comparison of…
Descriptors: Evolution, Scientific Concepts, Secondary School Teachers, Science Teachers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Pickett, Kurt M.; Wenzel, John W.; Rissing, Steven W. – American Biology Teacher, 2005
Behe (1998) and Wells (1999) claimed that embryological support for Darwinian evolution is based on the drawings of the 19th century embryologist Ernst Haeckel (1834-1919) whose embryological drawings were regarded inaccurate and fraudulent. The history of modern embryology, the roles played by Von Baer and Haeckel in that history and the manner…
Descriptors: Science History, Embryology, Evolution, Theories
Mathison, Jane – Biology and Human Affairs, 1976
The idea of evolution is examined in a historical perspective in this article. Considerable discussion is given to the works of Lamarck and Darwin. The evolutionary process is also examined with respect to philosophy, art and music history, and man's place in nature. References are included. (MA)
Descriptors: Biology, Evolution, Genetics, Heredity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bowler, Peter – Impact of Science on Society, 1990
The link between science and society is examined by studying the application of evolution theories and genetics to human affairs. Described are the ways in which biological theories have been applied to social issues. (KR)
Descriptors: Biology, Evolution, Genetics, Science and Society
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Charlesworth, William R. – Developmental Psychology, 1992
Darwin's weak influence on developmental psychology is traced. It is explained by (1) developmentalists' commitment to an ideology of meliorism; (2) conceptual issues relating to ontogeny and phylogeny; and (3) methodological problems. Suggests that developmentalists use evolutionary theory as a heuristic for structuring new research. (BC)
Descriptors: Biology, Developmental Psychology, Evolution, Ideology
Campbell, John Angus – 1990
Several implications for the understanding of the Darwinian revolution follow from an analysis of the role of colloquial language and prudential reason in Charles Darwin's quest for a theory of evolution. First, the term "natural selection" is not merely or even primarily a technical term and thus cannot be understood accurately apart…
Descriptors: Biology, Communication (Thought Transfer), Evolution, Language Role
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bardell, David – American Biology Teacher, 1994
Describes briefly the development of ancient as well as current theories and ideas on biological evolution. (ZWH)
Descriptors: Biology, Evolution, Greek, High Schools
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Dalrymple, G. Brent – Science Teacher, 2000
Reviews scientific evidence for the age of the earth, solar system, galaxy, and universe instead of following creationist beliefs about the history of Earth, the universe, and Earth's biota. (ASK)
Descriptors: Earth Science, Elementary Secondary Education, Evolution, Science History
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hull, David L.; And Others – Science, 1978
Examines two views about acceptance of Darwin's theory by scientists in Great Britain; that all scientists had accepted it within ten years after the publication of "Origin of Species," and that young scientists accepted the theory faster than old scientists. Concludes that both views are not accurate. (GA)
Descriptors: Attitudes, Beliefs, Evolution, Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Demaret, J. L.; Vandermeulen, J. E. H. L. – Impact of Science on Society, 1979
Discusses the hypothesis studied by astrophysicists on the symmetry between matter and anti-matter in the composition of the universe. (HM)
Descriptors: Astronomy, Electronics, Evolution, Matter
Mayer, William V. – Humanist, 1977
The author reviews research on the origins of life, beginning with Thales (636 B.C.), synthesized by C. Darwin in "The Origin of Species," continued by H. DeVries' mutation theory, and enhanced by the discovery in 1944 of DNA. For journal availability, see SO 505 260. (AV)
Descriptors: Biology, Evolution, Genetics, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Skoog, Gerald – American Biology Teacher, 1978
The inclusion of evolution as a topic in secondary school biology texts is examined in detail. The recent upsurge of mandates by the creationists is discussed with respect to current scientific knowledge and religious theology. Reasons for the exclusion of creationism in the biology curriculum are justified. (MA)
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, Biology, Court Litigation, Creationism
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Schweinsberg, John – Reports of the National Center for Science Education, 1997
A series of programs entitled Creationism and Evolution: The History of a Controversy was presented at the University of Alabama in Huntsville. The controversy was addressed from an historical and sociological, rather than a scientific perspective. Speakers addressed the evolution of scientific creationism, ancient texts versus sedimentary rocks…
Descriptors: Biblical Literature, Controversial Issues (Course Content), Creationism, Critical Reading
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Brush, Stephen G. – Journal of Geological Education, 1982
Refutes scientific creationists' arguments that the earth is less than 10,000 years old by presenting information related to the time scales for creation and evolution models, times from stellar distances, Kelvin's estimate of the earth's age, radioactive decay, radiometric dating, and the decay of the earth's magnetic field. (DC)
Descriptors: College Science, Creationism, Elementary Secondary Education, Evolution
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2