Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 1 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 3 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 9 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 18 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
| Davison, Alice | 2 |
| Schneider, David E. | 2 |
| Abbasnejad, Hannaheh | 1 |
| Agnihotri, R. K. | 1 |
| Algozzine, Kate | 1 |
| Anderson, Dana M. | 1 |
| Aydogan Yenmez, Arzu | 1 |
| Barr, Peter B. | 1 |
| Best, Rachel M. | 1 |
| Bilki, Zeynep | 1 |
| Braun, Carl | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 7 |
| Teachers | 4 |
| Administrators | 3 |
| Researchers | 2 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Flesch Reading Ease Formula | 5 |
| Flesch Kincaid Grade Level… | 4 |
| Dale Chall Readability Formula | 3 |
| Fry Readability Formula | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
McTigue, Erin M.; Slough, Scott W. – Reading Psychology, 2010
Within this article, we introduce our conception of text accessibility. First, we synthesize recent research on informational text quality and present key attributes proven to contribute to comprehension of science texts beyond the readability formula. These features include (a) the concreteness of text, (b) the voice of the author, (c) coherent…
Descriptors: Readability Formulas, Science Instruction, Textbooks, Textbook Content
Kasule, Daniel – Reading & Writing: Journal of the Reading Association of South Africa, 2011
This paper reports activities (as part of a university course in language teacher education on teaching reading) in which primary school student teachers (all ESL in-service teacher trainees) explored their own skills of determining textbook readability using an online software tool and a cloze test completed by two hundred and seventy-eight Grade…
Descriptors: Readability, Textbooks, Textbook Content, English (Second Language)
Peer reviewedBurkhead, Marie; Ulferts, Greg – Journal of Reading Behavior, 1977
Using 48 college texts, comparisons were made of Dale-Chall Readability Formula results based on samples taken from various page intervals. (HOD)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Higher Education, Readability, Readability Formulas
Kennedy, Keith – Curriculum Review, 1979
After discussing the ease of using the Fry Readability Graph, the author applies it to biology, chemistry, and physics texts, and lists the results. He warns that textbook authors and classroom teachers should be aware of the potential impact that the reading level of a text can have on students. (KC)
Descriptors: Guidelines, Readability, Readability Formulas, Science Materials
Peer reviewedRazek, Joseph R.; Cone, Randy E. – Journal of Business Communication, 1981
Reports results of a survey on the readability of 12 recently published business communication textbooks. Shows that important differences in readability do exist and that the majority of texts were within or below the lower end of the undergraduate-level reading range. (PD)
Descriptors: Business Communication, Higher Education, Readability, Readability Formulas
Peer reviewedJones, Karen H.; Anderson, Dana M. – Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 1994
Computer programs were used to analyze the readability of 61 textbooks used in secondary trade and industrial education. The formulas proved relatively equal in identifying difficulty levels. High human interest scores seemed to correlate with lower-level texts. (SK)
Descriptors: Microcomputers, Readability, Readability Formulas, Secondary Education
Peer reviewedMcCuaig, Susannah M.; Hutchings, Barton – Journal of Reading, 1975
Describes Fry's Readability Graph for determing the variations in difficulty throughout textbooks. (RB)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Measurement Instruments, Readability, Readability Formulas
Peer reviewedKeenan, Donna – Reading Horizons, 1982
Suggests that the popular and simple readability formulas may not be accurate enough to predict the instructional materials best suited to the reading abilities of secondary school students. (FL)
Descriptors: Readability Formulas, Reading Research, Secondary Education, Test Reliability
Peer reviewedNale, Robert D.; Rauch, Dennis A.; Barr, Peter B. – Journal of Workplace Learning: Employee Counselling Today, 1998
Readability indices were used to evaluate job-related reading matter; comparison with high school textbooks was made to determine a reading-level gap. A minimum high school reading comprehension level was assumed in workplace materials; textbooks often exhibited lower scores on reading formulas. (SK)
Descriptors: Employment Qualifications, High Schools, Organizational Communication, Readability Formulas
Eisen, Emily – 1981
The Fry Readability Formula was used to investigate the readability levels of stories contained in basal readers of the 1979 edition of the "Open Court" series for grades one through six. The average readability levels of the stories were then compared to those found in the 1976 edition of the same series. The purposes of the study were…
Descriptors: Basal Reading, Comparative Analysis, Elementary Education, Readability
Fiske, Edward B. – Principal, 1984
Textbook publishers are under attack for producing books that are superficial in content and oversimplified or confusing in language. They respond that their products are the inevitable result of applying the many textbook selection formulas to book production. Efforts by educators to improve textbooks are currently being organized. (PGD)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Readability Formulas, Textbook Evaluation, Textbook Publication
Peer reviewedEberwein, Lowell D. – Reading World, 1979
Reports two investigations, one related to the readability of certain basal readers and the other related to teacher knowledge of varying levels of readability of textbooks.
Descriptors: Basal Reading, Elementary Education, Readability, Readability Formulas
Ramsey, Richard N.; And Others – Forum for Reading, 1994
Finds that student perceptions of readability and interest levels in two upper-level college composition texts varied from the Flesch and the Fry readability and human interest formulas. (SR)
Descriptors: Higher Education, Readability, Readability Formulas, Reading Interests
Britton, Gwyneth; Lumpkin, Margaret – 1978
This booklet is comprised primarily of the summaries of computerized readability assessments of sample passages from each story or chapter in a reading textbook series for grades one through eight. Introductory chapters offer discussions of the computerized readability assessment program used, the various uses of readability information about a…
Descriptors: Computer Oriented Programs, Elementary Education, Measurement Techniques, Readability
Peer reviewedLorentzen, Karen M. – Reading Improvement, 1982
Argues that health educators must learn to predict readability levels of textbooks to be sure that they are challenging and understandable to the student. Concludes that this can be accomplished through the use of readability formulas. (FL)
Descriptors: Content Area Reading, Health Education, Readability, Readability Formulas

Direct link
