Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Readability Formulas | 4 |
| Science Education | 4 |
| Textbooks | 4 |
| Readability | 3 |
| Textbook Evaluation | 3 |
| Content Area Reading | 2 |
| Difficulty Level | 2 |
| Reading Research | 2 |
| Abstract Reasoning | 1 |
| Astronomy | 1 |
| College Science | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Canadian Journal of Education | 1 |
| Journal of Research in… | 1 |
| Physics Teacher | 1 |
| Viewpoints in Teaching and… | 1 |
Author
| Braun, Carl | 1 |
| Ciampa, Katia | 1 |
| Dukes, Robert J., Jr. | 1 |
| Fazio, Xavier | 1 |
| Gallagher, Tiffany | 1 |
| Haney, Richard E. | 1 |
| Holliday, William G. | 1 |
| Strauch, Katina | 1 |
| Vachon, Myra K. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 4 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Flesch Reading Ease Formula | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Gallagher, Tiffany; Fazio, Xavier; Ciampa, Katia – Canadian Journal of Education, 2017
Science curriculum standards were mapped onto various texts (literacy readers, trade books, online articles). Statistical analyses highlighted the inconsistencies among readability formulae for Grades 2-6 levels of the standards. There was a lack of correlation among the readability measures, and also when comparing different text sources. Online…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Readability, Textbooks, Science Education
Holliday, William G.; Braun, Carl – Viewpoints in Teaching and Learning, 1979
This article describes readability assessment methods used in science education, summarizes reported readability estimates of science textbooks, and recommends strategies for reducing the readability load of such materials. (JMF)
Descriptors: Measurement Techniques, Memory, Readability, Readability Formulas
Peer reviewedDukes, Robert J., Jr.; Strauch, Katina – Physics Teacher, 1983
Parts 1 and 2 (SE 524 424 and 527 089) described Flesch readability for determining a text's reading level and results of applying the test to astronomy/physics textbooks. This part presents results for a new sample of texts, including calculus-level texts. A comparison with high school physics texts is provided. (JM)
Descriptors: Astronomy, College Science, Difficulty Level, High Schools
Peer reviewedVachon, Myra K.; Haney, Richard E. – Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1991
The objectives of this study were to develop a method for scoring the level of abstraction (LOA) of science reading material and explore its relationship with other methods for assessing curriculum materials. LOA is defined as the ratio of the nonconcrete concepts to the total number of concepts in a written passage expressed as a percent.…
Descriptors: Abstract Reasoning, Content Area Reading, Developmental Stages, Educational Research


