Descriptor
| Equal Protection | 2 |
| Minimum Competency Testing | 2 |
| Testing Programs | 2 |
| Administrative Agencies | 1 |
| Administrative Problems | 1 |
| Bureaucracy | 1 |
| Civil Rights | 1 |
| Due Process | 1 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Equal Education | 1 |
| Federal Aid | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| School Law Bulletin | 1 |
Publication Type
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| North Carolina | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Civil Rights Act 1964 Title VI | 1 |
| Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedSmith, Michael R. – School Law Bulletin, 1978
Examines each of the four arguments aginst the North Carolina competency testing program: that the test will result in denial of equal protection of the law, in a violation of Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, and in a denial of both procedural and substantive due process. (Author/IRT)
Descriptors: Civil Rights, Due Process, Equal Protection, Minimum Competency Testing
PDF pending restorationMizell, M. Hayes – 1979
This paper discusses two examples of federal agencies which administer laws fundamental to the protection and advancement of the educational interests of minority children: the Office for Civil Rights, and the Division of Education for the Disadvantaged. Provisions of these laws can be construed as protective standards which may provide the major…
Descriptors: Administrative Agencies, Administrative Problems, Bureaucracy, Elementary Secondary Education
