Descriptor
| Error of Measurement | 3 |
| Scoring Formulas | 3 |
| Testing Problems | 3 |
| Child Abuse | 1 |
| Cost Effectiveness | 1 |
| Cutting Scores | 1 |
| Difficulty Level | 1 |
| Essay Tests | 1 |
| Mathematical Models | 1 |
| Multiple Choice Tests | 1 |
| Prediction | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedRowley, Glenn L.; Traub, Ross E. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1977
The consequences of formula scoring versus number right scoring are examined in relation to the assumptions commonly made about the behavior of examinees in testing situations. The choice between the two is shown to be dependent upon having reduced error variance or unbiasedness as a goal. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Error of Measurement, Scoring Formulas, Statistical Bias, Test Wiseness
Tsujimoto, Richard N.; Berger, Dale E. – Child Abuse and Neglect: The International Journal, 1988
Two criteria are discussed for determining cutting scores on a predictor variable for identifying cases of likely child abuse--utility maximizing and error minimizing. Utility maximizing is the preferable criterion, as it optimizes the balance between the costs of incorrect decisions and the benefits of correct decisions. (Author/JDD)
Descriptors: Child Abuse, Cost Effectiveness, Cutting Scores, Error of Measurement
Livingston, Samuel A. – 1986
This paper deals with test fairness regarding a test consisting of two parts: (1) a "common" section, taken by all students; and (2) a "variable" section, in which some students may answer a different set of questions from other students. For example, a test taken by several thousand students each year contains a common multiple-choice portion and…
Descriptors: Difficulty Level, Error of Measurement, Essay Tests, Mathematical Models


