Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Adults | 1 |
| Cues | 1 |
| Familiarity | 1 |
| Feedback (Response) | 1 |
| Memory | 1 |
| Multiple Choice Tests | 1 |
| Recall (Psychology) | 1 |
| Recognition (Psychology) | 1 |
| Test Format | 1 |
| Testing Problems | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Experimental… | 1 |
Author
| Alamri, Aeshah | 1 |
| Higham, Philip A. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkAlamri, Aeshah; Higham, Philip A. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2022
Corrective feedback is often touted as a critical benefit to learning, boosting testing effects when retrieval is poor and reducing negative testing effects. Here, we explore the dark side of corrective feedback. In three experiments, we found that corrective feedback on multiple-choice (MC) practice questions is later endorsed as the answer to…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Multiple Choice Tests, Cues, Recall (Psychology)
