NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing 1 to 15 of 16 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Merrel, Jeremy D.; Cirillo, Pier F.; Schwartz, Pauline M.; Webb, Jeffrey A. – Higher Education Studies, 2015
Multiple choice testing is a common but often ineffective method for evaluating learning. A newer approach, however, using Immediate Feedback Assessment Technique (IF AT®, Epstein Educational Enterprise, Inc.) forms, offers several advantages. In particular, a student learns immediately if his or her answer is correct and, in the case of an…
Descriptors: Multiple Choice Tests, Feedback (Response), Evaluation Methods, Guessing (Tests)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Albanese, Mark A. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1988
Estimates of the effects of use of formula scoring on the individual examinee's score are presented. Results for easy, moderate, and hard tests are examined. Using test characteristics from several studies shows that some examinees would increase scores substantially if they were to answer items omitted under formula directions. (SLD)
Descriptors: Difficulty Level, Guessing (Tests), Scores, Scoring Formulas
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lord, Frederic M. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1975
The assumption that examinees either know the answer to a test item or else guess at random is usually totally implausible. A different assumption is outlined, under which formula scoring is found to be clearly superior to number right scoring. (Author)
Descriptors: Guessing (Tests), Multiple Choice Tests, Response Style (Tests), Scoring
Wilcox, Rand R. – 1979
In the past, several latent structure models have been proposed for handling problems associated with measuring the achievement of examinees. Typically, however, these models describe a specific examinee in terms of an item domain or they describe a few items in terms of a population of examinees. In this paper, a model is proposed which allows a…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Guessing (Tests), Mathematical Models, Multiple Choice Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Frary, Robert B. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1980
Six scoring methods for assigning weights to right or wrong responses according to various instructions given to test takers are analyzed with respect to expected change scores and the effect of various levels of information and misinformation. Three of the methods provide feedback to the test taker. (Author/CTM)
Descriptors: Guessing (Tests), Knowledge Level, Multiple Choice Tests, Scores
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Abu-Sayf, F. K. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1977
A new formula for the correction for chance success due to guessing was advanced and investigated, the mathematical solution of which has the property of equating the scores of fast and slow examinees of equal ability. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Academic Ability, Equated Scores, Guessing (Tests), Scoring Formulas
Angoff, William H. – 1985
This paper points out that there are certain generalizations about directions for guessing and methods of scoring that require that data be derived from random groups design. It supports the viewpoint that it is neither sufficient nor appropriate to make such generalizations on the basis of an analysis of scores obtained from the answer sheets of…
Descriptors: Correlation, Guessing (Tests), Research Design, Scoring Formulas
Boldt, Robert F. – 1974
One formulation of confidence scoring requires the examinee to indicate as a number his personal probability of the correctness of each alternative in a multiple-choice test. For this formulation a linear transformation of the logarithm of the correct response is maximized if the examinee accurately reports his personal probability. To equate…
Descriptors: Confidence Testing, Guessing (Tests), Multiple Choice Tests, Probability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Diamond, James J. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1975
Investigates the reliability and validity of scores yielded from a new scoring formula. (Author/DEP)
Descriptors: Guessing (Tests), Multiple Choice Tests, Objective Tests, Scoring
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Aiken, Lewis R.; Williams, Newsom – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1978
Seven formulas for scoring test items with two options (true-false or multiple choice with only two choices) were investigated. Several conditions, such as varying directions for guessing and whether testees had prior knowledge of the proportions of false items on the test were also investigated. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Guessing (Tests), Higher Education, Knowledge Level, Multiple Choice Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Angoff, William H.; Schrader, William B. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1984
The reported data provide a basis for evaluating the formula-scoring versus rights-scoring issue and for assessing the effects of directions on the reliability and parallelism of scores for sophisticated examinees taking professionally developed tests. Results support the invariance hypothesis rather than the differential effects hypothesis.…
Descriptors: College Entrance Examinations, Guessing (Tests), Higher Education, Hypothesis Testing
Echternacht, Gary J.; And Others – 1971
This handbook presents instructions for implementing a confidence testing program in technical training situations, identification of possible areas of application, techniques for evaluating confidence information, advantages and disadvantages of confidence testing, time considerations, and problem areas. Complete instructions for "Pick-One" and…
Descriptors: Confidence Testing, Educational Diagnosis, Guessing (Tests), Measurement Techniques
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hakstian, A. Ralph; Kansup, Wanlop – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1975
A comparison of reliability and validity was made for three testing procedures: 1) responding conventionally to Verbal Ability and Mathematical Reasoning tests; 2) using a confidence weighting response procedure with the same tests; and 3) using the elimination response method. The experimental testing procedures were not psychometrically superior…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Confidence Testing, Guessing (Tests), Junior High School Students
Donlon, Thomas F. – 1975
This study empirically determined the optimizing weight to be applied to the Wrongs Total Score in scoring rubrics of the general form = R - kW, where S is the Score, R the Rights Total, k the weight and W the Wrongs Total, if reliability is to be maximized. As is well known, the traditional formula score rests on a theoretical framework which is…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Comparative Analysis, Guessing (Tests), Multiple Choice Tests
Larkin, Kevin C.; Weiss, David J. – 1975
A 15-stage pyramidal test and a 40-item two-stage test were constructed and administered by computer to 111 college undergraduates. The two-stage test was found to utilize a smaller proportion of its potential score range than the pyramidal test. Score distributions for both tests were positively skewed but not significantly different from the…
Descriptors: Ability, Aptitude Tests, Comparative Analysis, Computer Programs
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2