Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Cheating | 3 |
| Test Content | 3 |
| Testing | 3 |
| Foreign Countries | 2 |
| Scores | 2 |
| Certification | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Confidentiality | 1 |
| Credentials | 1 |
| Dental Schools | 1 |
| Educational Policy | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| High School Equivalency… | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Canada | 2 |
| United States | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| General Educational… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Wolkowitz, Amanda A.; Davis-Becker, Susan L.; Gerrow, Jack D. – Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 2016
The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of a cheating prevention strategy employed for a professional credentialing exam that involved releasing over 7,000 active and retired exam items. This study evaluated: 1) If any significant differences existed between examinee performance on released versus non-released items; 2) If item…
Descriptors: Cheating, Test Content, Test Items, Foreign Countries
GED Testing Service, 2018
The manual is presented in the form of a policy grid. The grid includes a consolidated list of General Educational Development (GED) Testing Service policies regarding the GED® test and overall GED® program. The grid combines all of the policies into one unified table and supersedes any prior policy manual.
Descriptors: High School Equivalency Programs, Equivalency Tests, Testing Programs, Educational Policy
Peer reviewedDruger, Marvin – Journal of College Science Teaching, 2000
Provides helpful guidelines for creating exams and grading. Three main questions are addressed: (1) If it is known what content is important, then why not tell the students?; (2) Should students compete against each other or compete against course content?; and (3) What is the best way to handle cheating? (SAH)
Descriptors: Cheating, Evaluation, Grading, Higher Education

Direct link
