NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 5 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Warschausky, Seth; Van Tubbergen, Marie; Asbell, Shana; Kaufman, Jacqueline; Ayyangar, Rita; Donders, Jacobus – Assessment, 2012
This study examined the psychometric properties of test presentation and response formats that were modified to be accessible with the use of assistive technology (AT). First, the stability of psychometric properties was examined in 60 children, ages 6 to 12, with no significant physical or communicative impairments. Population-specific…
Descriptors: Testing, Assistive Technology, Testing Accommodations, Psychometrics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Vecchione, Michele; Alessandri, Guido; Barbaranelli, Claudio – Assessment, 2012
This study investigates the measurement equivalence of a five-factor measure of personality across two groups applying for jobs, who completed the same questionnaire using either a paper-and-pencil (n = 429) or a web online answer format (n = 651). The data were collected using the Big Five Questionnaire-2 (BFQ-2; which is a measure of the Five…
Descriptors: Personality Traits, Personality Assessment, Computer Assisted Testing, Measures (Individuals)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Brock, Rebecca L.; Barry, Robin A.; Lawrence, Erika; Dey, Jodi; Rolffs, Jaci – Assessment, 2012
This study examined the psychometric equivalence of paper-and-pencil and Internet formats of key questionnaires used in couple research. Self-report questionnaires assessing interpersonal constructs (relationship satisfaction, communication/conflict management, partner support, emotional intimacy) and intrapersonal constructs (individual traits,…
Descriptors: Satisfaction, Conflict, Intimacy, Questionnaires
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Frederick, Richard I.; Bowden, Stephen C. – Assessment, 2009
Common rates employed in classificatory testing are the true positive rate (TPR), false positive rate (FPR), positive predictive power (PPP), and negative predictive power (NPP). FPR and TPR are estimated from research samples representing populations to be distinguished by classificatory testing. PPP and NPP are used by clinicians to classify…
Descriptors: Testing, Classification, Psychological Testing, Predictor Variables
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Goldfarb, Lori Plante; And Others – Assessment, 1995
The impact of examiner eye contact versus no eye contact during administration of the Digit Span subtest of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children III was examined for 40 college students and 41 high school students. Results suggest that eye contact did not improve performance and was not preferred by subjects. (SLD)
Descriptors: Eye Contact, High School Students, High Schools, Higher Education