Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 2 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 9 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 30 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 70 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
| Hambleton, Ronald K. | 14 |
| Popham, W. James | 8 |
| Ebel, Robert L. | 7 |
| Haladyna, Tom | 6 |
| Roid, Gale | 6 |
| Tindal, Gerald | 5 |
| Baker, Eva L. | 4 |
| Kriewall, Thomas E. | 4 |
| Roudabush, Glenn E. | 4 |
| Berk, Ronald A. | 3 |
| Eignor, Daniel R. | 3 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 22 |
| Researchers | 17 |
| Teachers | 7 |
| Administrators | 3 |
| Parents | 2 |
| Policymakers | 2 |
| Counselors | 1 |
| Students | 1 |
| Support Staff | 1 |
Location
| Australia | 10 |
| Florida | 5 |
| Texas | 5 |
| California | 4 |
| Canada | 4 |
| Tennessee | 4 |
| Georgia | 3 |
| Illinois | 3 |
| Iran | 3 |
| Kansas | 3 |
| Louisiana | 3 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Hall, John D.; Howerton, D. Lynn; Jones, Craig H. – Research in the Schools, 2008
The No Child Left Behind Act and the accountability movement in public education caused many states to develop criterion-referenced academic achievement tests. Scores from these tests are often used to make high stakes decisions. Even so, these tests typically do not receive independent psychometric scrutiny. We evaluated the 2005 Arkansas…
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Achievement Tests, High Stakes Tests, Public Education
Peer reviewedRozeboom, William W. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1978
A strict equivalence presupposed by Kaiser and Michael to derive the coefficient of "domain validity" is defensible only as a biased approximation. But then, it is far from clear what psychometric significance this coefficient has in the first place. (Author)
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Item Analysis, Item Banks, Test Validity
Vivo, Juana-Maria; Franco, Manuel – International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 2008
This article attempts to present a novel application of a method of measuring accuracy for academic success predictors that could be used as a standard. This procedure is known as the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, which comes from statistical decision techniques. The statistical prediction techniques provide predictor models and…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Item Response Theory, Criterion Referenced Tests, Predictor Variables
Nitko, Anthony J. – 1980
A framework, or classification scheme, is provided for displaying the spectrum of criterion-referenced tests. This framework illustrates that no single type of test can be identified as the absolute prototype criterion-referenced test. It is shown that over the past 115 years criterion-referenced testing has grown to be a many-faceted concept, its…
Descriptors: Classification, Criterion Referenced Tests, Test Construction, Test Validity
Popham, W. James – 1981
Teachers should be evaluated chiefly by the results they produce. Those results will not be properly detected through the use of norm-referenced achievement tests (NRT) due to the following major deficits of NRT: (1) the descriptions of what is measured by NRT are far too loose; (2) evaluative expectations are unclear; (3) the necessity for NRT to…
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Norm Referenced Tests, Teacher Evaluation, Test Validity
Meisels, Samuel J.; Xue, Yange; Shamblott, Melissa – Early Education and Development, 2008
Research Findings: We examined the reliability and validity of the language, literacy, and mathematics domains of "Work Sampling for Head Start" (WSHS), an observational assessment designed for 3- and 4-year-olds. Participants included 112 children who were enrolled over a two-year period in Head Start and a number of other programs…
Descriptors: Preschool Children, Preschool Education, Early Intervention, Criterion Referenced Tests
Kennedy, Beth T. – 1972
Issues related to the evaluation of instructional programs developed under the auspices of the Southwest Educational Development Laboratory are briefly discussed. The Laboratory develops criterion-referenced tests which form an integral part of each instructional program. The importance of examining the reliability and validity of these tests is…
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Evaluation Methods, Instructional Programs, Test Reliability
Peer reviewedWoodson, M. I. Chas. E. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1974
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Item Analysis, Test Construction, Test Reliability
Peer reviewedYoung, James C.; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1970
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Algebra, Criterion Referenced Tests, Mathematics
Peer reviewedSchell, Leo – Reading World, 1979
Suggests that there are major issues involved in using criterion-referenced reading tests that are unclear or unresolved, including their place in the system of teaching reading, their validity, their reliability, and how cut-off scores are set and evaluated. (TJ)
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Elementary Education, Reading Tests, Test Reliability
Fore, Cecil, III; Boon, Richard T.; Martin, Christopher – International Journal of Special Education, 2007
There has been a recent emphasis on improving the academic performance of students with emotional and behavioral disorders (EBD). Improving the academic performance of students with EBD is especially important in the current accountability era in which there is much emphasis placed on performance of standardized tests. The purpose of this study…
Descriptors: Test Validity, Middle School Students, Behavior Disorders, Emotional Disturbances
Peer reviewedAlgina, James; Noe, Michael J. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1978
A computer simulation study was conducted to investigate Subkoviak's index of reliability for criterion-referenced tests, called the coefficient of agreement. Results indicate that the index can be adequately estimated. (JKS)
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Mastery Tests, Measurement, Test Reliability
Peer reviewedSubkoviak, Michael J. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1978
Four different methods for estimating the proportions of testees properly classified as having mastered or not mastered test content are examined, using data from the Scholastic Aptitude Test. All four methods prove reasonably accurate and all show some bias under certain conditions. (JKS)
Descriptors: Bias, Criterion Referenced Tests, Mastery Tests, Measurement
Peer reviewedZimmerman, Donald W. – Journal of Experimental Education, 1977
Derives formulas for the validity of predictor-criterion tests that hold for all test scores constructed according to the expected-value concept of true score. These more general formulas disclose some paradoxical properties of test validity under conditions where errors are correlated and have some implications for practical testing situations…
Descriptors: Correlation, Criterion Referenced Tests, Scoring Formulas, Tables (Data)
Campbell, Clifton P.; Allender, Bill R. – Canadian Vocational Journal, 1988
Criterion-referenced performance tests (CRPT) provide a realistic method for objectively measuring task proficiency against predetermined attainment standards. This article explains the procedures of constructing, validating, and scoring CRPTs and includes a checklist for a welding test. (JOW)
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Postsecondary Education, Scoring, Test Construction

Direct link
