Publication Date
| In 2026 | 1 |
| Since 2025 | 373 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1483 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 3351 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 5199 |
Descriptor
| Test Reliability | 9997 |
| Test Validity | 9997 |
| Test Construction | 3337 |
| Foreign Countries | 2933 |
| Psychometrics | 1825 |
| Factor Analysis | 1674 |
| Measures (Individuals) | 1332 |
| Evaluation Methods | 955 |
| Questionnaires | 931 |
| College Students | 869 |
| Factor Structure | 850 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 297 |
| Practitioners | 226 |
| Teachers | 84 |
| Administrators | 61 |
| Policymakers | 27 |
| Counselors | 25 |
| Students | 13 |
| Parents | 9 |
| Community | 5 |
| Support Staff | 5 |
Location
| Turkey | 694 |
| China | 175 |
| Australia | 171 |
| Canada | 146 |
| Indonesia | 122 |
| Spain | 106 |
| Taiwan | 91 |
| United States | 86 |
| Germany | 83 |
| United Kingdom | 82 |
| Malaysia | 77 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 1 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 1 |
| Does not meet standards | 1 |
Hammill, Donald D.; and others – Except Children, 1970
Descriptors: Exceptional Child Research, Intelligence Tests, Test Reliability, Test Validity
Golightly, Carole; And Others – Develop Psychol, 1970
Descriptors: Behavior Rating Scales, Item Analysis, Measurement Instruments, Test Reliability
Peer reviewedCrehan, Kevin D.; Slakter, Malcolm J. – Psychological Reports, 1971
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Multiple Choice Tests, Test Construction, Test Reliability
Hambleton, Ronald K.; And Others – J Educ Meas, 1970
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Methods, Multiple Choice Tests, Test Reliability
Peer reviewedKhatena, Joe – Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1971
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Creativity, Test Interpretation, Test Reliability
Peer reviewedRuschival, M. Lena; Way, John Gilbert – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1971
The purpose of the study was to determine whether WPPSI is a valid and reliable instrument for the measurement of the intelligence of children whose scores fall within the upper range as measured by the Stanford-Binet. The results of this study indicated that there was only a moderate relationship between the two. (Author)
Descriptors: Exceptional Child Research, Gifted, Intelligence, Intelligence Tests
Peer reviewedGross, Jerry C.; And Others – Journal of Special Education, 1970
Descriptors: Exceptional Child Research, Kinesthetic Perception, Mental Retardation, Test Reliability
Silverstein, A. B. – J Consult Clin Psychol, 1970
Data from the WAIS, WISC, and WPPSI Standardization samples were used to reappraise validity of all short forms of two, three, four, and five subtests. Results were compared with those given by McNemar's formula. The corrected formula gave lower values and selected "best short forms that differed from McNemar's formula. (Author)
Descriptors: Intelligence Tests, Research, Test Reliability, Test Results
Thumin, Fred J. – Percept Mot Skills, 1970
Descriptors: Ability, College Students, Intelligence Tests, Test Construction
Dewing, Kathleen – Brit J Educ Psychol, 1970
Descriptors: Correlation, Creative Thinking, Grade 7, Test Reliability
Peer reviewedSpitz, Herman H. – Journal of Special Education, 1983
The reliability and stability of the Full Scale IQ scores of retarded adolescents and young adults of three Wechsler Scales were measured. (Author)
Descriptors: Adolescents, Intelligence Tests, Mental Retardation, Test Reliability
Peer reviewedBannister, Marcia L.; Britten, C. Frederick – Journal of Communication Disorders, 1982
Validity and reliability of a videotaped speechreading test, "Eyes and Spoken Language," designed to assess how effectively a person utilizes linguistic constraints in responding to spoken language via the visual pathway, were established using responses of 68 nonhearing impaired young adults. A significant learning effect was…
Descriptors: Hearing Impairments, Lipreading, Test Reliability, Test Validity
Peer reviewedSchwab, Richard L.; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1983
The construct validity of the Role Questionnaire (Rizzo, et al.) for teachers was assessed through an analysis of the complete responses of a randomly selected sample of 448 Massachusetts teachers. The results of this cross-validation provide support for the construct validity of the questionnaire. (Author/PN)
Descriptors: Adults, Factor Analysis, Questionnaires, Role Conflict
Peer reviewedAnderson, Jonathan – Journal of Reading, 1983
Indicates that the Rix modification of the Lix Readability Formula is easy to calculate, correlates highly with other popular formulas, and is useful for materials for grades 3 through 12. (AEA)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Readability Formulas, Test Reliability, Test Validity
Peer reviewedReynolds, William M.; Bernstein, Sydna M. – Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1982
The factorial validity and internal consistency reliability of the Devereux Elementary School Behavior Rating Scale were examined with a random sample of elementary school children. Given the problem of multicollinearity that was shown to exist among subscales, the authors suggest caution in the interpretation of Devereux subscales as discrete…
Descriptors: Behavior Rating Scales, Elementary Education, Emotional Problems, Test Reliability


