Publication Date
| In 2026 | 1 |
| Since 2025 | 373 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1483 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 3351 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 5199 |
Descriptor
| Test Reliability | 9997 |
| Test Validity | 9997 |
| Test Construction | 3337 |
| Foreign Countries | 2933 |
| Psychometrics | 1825 |
| Factor Analysis | 1674 |
| Measures (Individuals) | 1332 |
| Evaluation Methods | 955 |
| Questionnaires | 931 |
| College Students | 869 |
| Factor Structure | 850 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 297 |
| Practitioners | 226 |
| Teachers | 84 |
| Administrators | 61 |
| Policymakers | 27 |
| Counselors | 25 |
| Students | 13 |
| Parents | 9 |
| Community | 5 |
| Support Staff | 5 |
Location
| Turkey | 694 |
| China | 175 |
| Australia | 171 |
| Canada | 146 |
| Indonesia | 122 |
| Spain | 106 |
| Taiwan | 91 |
| United States | 86 |
| Germany | 83 |
| United Kingdom | 82 |
| Malaysia | 77 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 1 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 1 |
| Does not meet standards | 1 |
Screening for Pragmatic Language Impairment: The Potential of the Children's Communication Checklist
Ketelaars, Mieke P.; Cuperus, Juliane M.; van Daal, John; Jansonius, Kino; Verhoeven, Ludo – Research in Developmental Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2009
The present study examines the validity of the Dutch Children's Communication Checklist (CCC) for children in kindergarten in a community sample, in order to assess the feasibility of using it as a screening instrument in the general population. Teachers completed the CCC for a representative sample of 1396 children at kindergarten level, taken…
Descriptors: Check Lists, Emotional Problems, Language Impairments, Construct Validity
Peer reviewedKaiser, Henry F.; Michael, William B. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1975
An alternative derivation of Tryon's basic formula for the coefficient of domain validity or the coefficient of generalizability developed by Cronbach, Rajaratnam, and Glaser is provided. This derivation, which is also the generalized Kuder-Richardson coefficient, requires a relatively minimal number of assumptions compared with that in previously…
Descriptors: Matrices, Sampling, Statistical Analysis, Test Reliability
Oltman, Philip K. – Percept Mot Skills, 1969
Descriptors: Arousal Patterns, Auditory Stimuli, Test Reliability, Test Validity
Goldsamt, Milton G. – Percept Mot Skills, 1969
Descriptors: Adults, Intelligence, Psychological Testing, Test Reliability
Robinson, Lora; Seligman, Richard – 1968
Items for a morale scale were selected from Pace's College and University Environment Scales (CUES). The initial morale scale of 55 items was reduced to 22 items without substantially changing the dimension being measured. The scale discriminates among the 100 colleges in Pace's national sample, and its reliability is acceptable. The items-scale…
Descriptors: College Students, Measurement Instruments, Test Reliability, Test Validity
Collet, LeVerne S. – 1970
A critical review of systems of scoring multiple choice tests is presented and the superiority of a system based upon elimination method over one based upon the best answer mode is hypothesized. This is discussed in terms of the capacity of the mode to reveal the relationships among decoy options and the effects of partial information,…
Descriptors: Multiple Choice Tests, Scoring, Test Reliability, Test Validity
Peer reviewedCallender, John C.; Osburn, H. G. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1977
A FORTRAN program for maximizing and cross-validating split-half reliability coefficients is described. Externally computed arrays of item means and covariances are used as input for each of two samples. The user may select a number of subsets from the complete set of items for analysis in a single run. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Computer Programs, Item Analysis, Test Reliability, Test Validity
Peer reviewedKagan, Norman; Schneider, John – Journal of Counseling & Development, 1987
Describes some of the theoretical bases for the Affective Sensitivity Scale and reports research data on revisions that have been added since 1970. Proposes theoretical constructs to explain the role of affective sensitivity in the process of empathy. (Author/ABB)
Descriptors: Affective Measures, Empathy, Test Reliability, Test Validity
Peer reviewedMiller, Ivan W.; And Others – Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 1985
Reports series of studies investigating reliability and validity of the McMaster Family Assessment Device (FAD). Results indicated that the FAD has: (1) adequate test-retest reliability, (2) low correlations with social desirability, (3) moderate correlations with other self-report measures of family functioning, and (4) differentiates…
Descriptors: Family Life, Family Problems, Test Reliability, Test Validity
Peer reviewedWeeks, David J. – Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1986
Presents a brief clinical test, derived from earlier neuropsychological instruments, with evidence for its reliability, interscorer agreement, and validity. The latter is based upon correlations with both CAT scan measures of cortical atrophy and ventricular enlargement, as well as correlations with seven other previously validated cognitive…
Descriptors: Cognitive Tests, Neurological Impairments, Test Reliability, Test Validity
Peer reviewedSackett, Paul R.; Harris, Michael M. – Personnel Psychology, 1984
Describes paper and pencil predictions of employee theft and examines studies of validity, reliability, and adverse impact of these tests. Results showed consistently positive correlations, but identified a variety of methodological differences which make the direct comparison of test validities suspect. (LLL)
Descriptors: Employees, Honesty, Predictor Variables, Test Reliability
Peer reviewedZook, Avery, II; Sipps, Gary J. – Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1985
Presents a cross-validation of Reynolds' short form of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale (N=233). Researchers administered 13 items as a separate entity, calculated Cronbach's Alpha for each sex, and computed test-retest correlation for one group. Concluded that the short form is a viable alternative. (Author/NRB)
Descriptors: College Students, Sex Differences, Test Reliability, Test Validity
Peer reviewedBell, Morris D.; And Others – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1985
Factor analysis of the Bell Reality Testing Inventory items produced three subscales interpreted as dimensions of the reality testing ego function: Reality Distortion, Uncertainty of Perception, Hallucinations and Delusions. Replication factor analysis confirmed the factor structure. Subscales appear sensitive to variations in psychopathology and…
Descriptors: Adults, Factor Structure, Psychopathology, Test Reliability
Peer reviewedPadget, S. Yancey – Reading Teacher, 1985
Concludes that while the screening test consists of well-designed and carefully standardized items, its overwhelming preponderance of visual-motor tasks minimizes its usefulness in screening for possible school learning problems. Suggests that it might best be used by therapists working with children in treatment facilities that follow a medical…
Descriptors: Preschool Education, Screening Tests, Test Reliability, Test Validity
Peer reviewedMilner, Joel S.; Robertson, Kevin R. – Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1985
Employed 479 subjects to develop and initially validate a random response scale for the Child Abuse Potential Inventory. Preliminary norm and reliability estimates are reported. Cross-validation and construct validity data are provided, indicating that the random response scale is stable across groups and can discriminate normal responders from…
Descriptors: Adults, Child Abuse, Responses, Test Reliability

Direct link
