Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Adaptive Testing | 3 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 3 |
| Computer Simulation | 3 |
| Test Items | 3 |
| Test Length | 3 |
| Test Validity | 3 |
| Item Banks | 2 |
| Test Construction | 2 |
| Academic Ability | 1 |
| College Entrance Examinations | 1 |
| Comparative Testing | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Wainer, Howard | 2 |
| Bulut, Okan | 1 |
| Kan, Adnan | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Turkey | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Bulut, Okan; Kan, Adnan – Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 2012
Problem Statement: Computerized adaptive testing (CAT) is a sophisticated and efficient way of delivering examinations. In CAT, items for each examinee are selected from an item bank based on the examinee's responses to the items. In this way, the difficulty level of the test is adjusted based on the examinee's ability level. Instead of…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, College Entrance Examinations, Graduate Students
Wainer, Howard; And Others – 1991
A series of computer simulations was run to measure the relationship between testlet validity and the factors of item pool size and testlet length for both adaptive and linearly constructed testlets. Results confirmed the generality of earlier empirical findings of H. Wainer and others (1991) that making a testlet adaptive yields only marginal…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Computer Simulation, Item Banks
Peer reviewedWainer, Howard; And Others – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1992
Computer simulations were run to measure the relationship between testlet validity and factors of item pool size and testlet length for both adaptive and linearly constructed testlets. Making a testlet adaptive yields only modest increases in aggregate validity because of the peakedness of the typical proficiency distribution. (Author/SLD)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Comparative Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Computer Simulation


