Descriptor
Source
| Journal of Educational… | 8 |
Author
| Hakstian, A. Ralph | 2 |
| Kansup, Wanlop | 2 |
| Brandenburg, Dale C. | 1 |
| Collet, Leverne S. | 1 |
| Cross, Lawrence | 1 |
| Diamond, James J. | 1 |
| Frary, Robert | 1 |
| Jacobs, Stanley S. | 1 |
| Koehler, Roger A. | 1 |
| Whitney, Douglas R. | 1 |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedBrandenburg, Dale C.; Whitney, Douglas R. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1972
Primary purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of various scoring methods on the reliability and validity of the Primary Test of Economic Understanding (PTEU). the PTEU was designed to be scored using the matched pair procedure. (Authors)
Descriptors: Grade 3, Objective Tests, Response Style (Tests), Scoring Formulas
Peer reviewedCollet, Leverne S. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1971
The purpose of this paper was to provide an empirical test of the hypothesis that elimination scores are more reliable and valid than classical corrected-for-guessing scores or weighted-choice scores. The evidence presented supports the hypothesized superiority of elimination scoring. (Author)
Descriptors: Evaluation, Guessing (Tests), Multiple Choice Tests, Scoring Formulas
Peer reviewedKoehler, Roger A. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1971
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Comparative Analysis, Confidence Testing, Grade 11
Peer reviewedDiamond, James J. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1975
Investigates the reliability and validity of scores yielded from a new scoring formula. (Author/DEP)
Descriptors: Guessing (Tests), Multiple Choice Tests, Objective Tests, Scoring
Peer reviewedJacobs, Stanley S. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1975
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Guessing (Tests), Multiple Choice Tests, Response Style (Tests)
Peer reviewedCross, Lawrence; Frary, Robert – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1977
Corrected-for-guessing scores on multiple-choice tests depend upon the ability and willingness of examinees to guess when they have some basis for answering, and to avoid guessing when they have no basis. The present study determined the extent to which college students were able and willing to comply with formula-scoring directions. (Author/CTM)
Descriptors: Guessing (Tests), Higher Education, Individual Characteristics, Multiple Choice Tests
Peer reviewedKansup, Wanlop; Hakstian, A. Ralph – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1975
Effects of logically weighting incorrect item options in conventional tests and different scoring functions with confidence tests on reliability and validity were examined. Ninth graders took conventionally administered Verbal and Mathematical Reasoning tests, scored conventionally and by a procedure assigning degree-of-correctness weights to…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Confidence Testing, Junior High School Students, Multiple Choice Tests
Peer reviewedHakstian, A. Ralph; Kansup, Wanlop – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1975
A comparison of reliability and validity was made for three testing procedures: 1) responding conventionally to Verbal Ability and Mathematical Reasoning tests; 2) using a confidence weighting response procedure with the same tests; and 3) using the elimination response method. The experimental testing procedures were not psychometrically superior…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Confidence Testing, Guessing (Tests), Junior High School Students


