Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 2 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 2 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 4 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 5 |
Descriptor
| Test Reliability | 14 |
| Test Validity | 14 |
| Creativity | 11 |
| Creativity Tests | 7 |
| Creative Thinking | 3 |
| Foreign Countries | 3 |
| Innovation | 3 |
| Self Evaluation (Individuals) | 3 |
| Correlation | 2 |
| Creativity Research | 2 |
| Factor Analysis | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Creative Behavior | 14 |
Author
| Davis, Gary A. | 3 |
| Rimm, Sylvia | 3 |
| Basadur, Min | 1 |
| Boris Forthmann | 1 |
| Carlsson, Ingegerd | 1 |
| Cooper, Eileen | 1 |
| Duan, Wenjie | 1 |
| Haoran Xu | 1 |
| Janika Saretzki | 1 |
| Kaufman, James C. | 1 |
| Kruse, Joachim | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 11 |
| Reports - Research | 9 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 1 |
| Researchers | 1 |
Location
| Austria | 1 |
| China | 1 |
| Germany | 1 |
| Malaysia | 1 |
| Switzerland | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Kirton Adaption Innovation… | 1 |
| Torrance Tests of Creative… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Janika Saretzki; Rosalie Andrae; Boris Forthmann; Mathias Benedek – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2025
Divergent thinking (DT) ability is widely regarded as a central cognitive capacity underlying creativity, but its assessment is challenged by the fact that DT tasks yield a variable number of responses. Various approaches for the scoring of DT tasks have been proposed, which differ in how responses are evaluated and aggregated within a task. The…
Descriptors: Creative Thinking, Creativity Tests, Scoring, Metacognition
Yongzhong Yang; Haoran Xu – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2025
With the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI), AI creativity has demonstrated significant potential for application across various fields. This study aims to explore the multidimensional characteristics of AI creativity from the audience's perspective and to develop a corresponding measurement scale. Specifically, Study 1 utilized…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Creativity, Measures (Individuals), Test Construction
Duan, Wenjie; Li, Yumei – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2020
This study examined the validity of a 14-item two-factor person-environment fit scale for creativity (PEFSC) to measure the personal and environmental components of creativity. A sample of 2,475 participants completed the PEFSC for evaluating the factor structure. For convergent, discriminant, and incremental validities, a subsample (N = 362)…
Descriptors: Creativity, Innovation, Measures (Individuals), Goodness of Fit
Tan, Chee-Seng; Ong, Anna Wen-Huey – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2019
The 13-item self-rated creativity scale (SRCS) initially developed for supervisory rating of employees' creativity was modified by some researchers and used as a self-report of creativity. However, it is not clear if the modified SRCS is psychometrically sound. The present study addressed this gap in three studies (N = 1,033). The exploratory…
Descriptors: Creativity, Employees, Evaluation Methods, Psychometrics
Werner, Christian H.; Tang, Min; Kruse, Joachim; Kaufman, James C.; Spörrle, Matthias – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2014
The present study examines the factor structure of a Chinese version of the Revised Creativity Domain Questionnaire (CDQ-R; Kaufman, Waterstreet, Ailaouni, Whitcomb, Roe, & Riggs, 2009) as well as its relation to Big Five personality traits within a Chinese sample (N = 787). Analyses indicate the appropriateness of the Chinese version of the…
Descriptors: Questionnaires, Creativity Tests, Chinese, Test Validity
Peer reviewedTreffinger, Donald J.; Poggio, John P. – Journal of Creative Behavior, 1972
Purpose of this paper is to identify several critical problems and areas of needed research on the measurement of creativity. The area is surveyed in three general categories: validity, reliability, and usability. (Authors/CB)
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Creativity, Criteria, Measurement
Peer reviewedDavis, Gary A.; Rimm, Sylvia – Journal of Creative Behavior, 1982
Validation studies of the initial group inventory for finding interests (GIFFI) I and II were carried out with 1,024 students (grades 6-12). Internal consistency, reliability, and validity of the scales, which measure personality and biographical characteristics associated with creativity were substantiated. (CL)
Descriptors: Creativity, High Schools, Junior High Schools, Personality Measures
Peer reviewedRimm, Sylvia; Davis, Gary A. – Journal of Creative Behavior, 1976
Findings here indicate that an inventory can be constructed for a wide age range of elementary school children which can predict creativity. GIFT is easy to administer and score, and correlates with a composite creativity criterion, art teacher nominations, and scores on a Uses test. (Author/RK)
Descriptors: Correlation, Creativity, Educational Testing, Measurement Instruments
Peer reviewedCooper, Eileen – Journal of Creative Behavior, 1991
This paper critiques the following tests of creativity: (1) the Torrance Test of Creative Thinking; (2) the Creativity Assessment Packet; (3) subtests of the Structure of the Intellect Learning Abilities Test; (4) Thinking Creatively with Sounds and Words; (5) Thinking Creatively in Action and Movement; and (6) the Khatena-Torrance Creative…
Descriptors: Creativity, Creativity Tests, Divergent Thinking, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewedPetrosko, Joseph M. – Journal of Creative Behavior, 1978
Descriptors: Creativity Tests, Elementary Education, Exceptional Child Research, Gifted
Peer reviewedSmith, Gudmund J. W.; Carlsson, Ingegerd – Journal of Creative Behavior, 1987
A new creativity test is described that is based on the percept-genetic theory, which presumes that percepts are built by ultra-short, mostly preconscious processes. The test uses a still-life with two main structures, which is shown in two series of presentations differing in length. Results of experiments using the test are described. (Author/KM)
Descriptors: Creative Thinking, Creativity, Creativity Research, Creativity Tests
Peer reviewedRimm, Sylvia; Davis, Gary A. – Journal of Creative Behavior, 1980
It is concluded, among other things, that although GIFT criterion related validity is modest, it predicts creativity about as well as other more complicated instruments, and its reliability is much better than teacher ratings or nominations; and that it also appears to have international and cross cultural face validity. (DLS)
Descriptors: Creativity, Creativity Research, Creativity Tests, Cross Cultural Studies
Peer reviewedBasadur, Min; And Others – Journal of Creative Behavior, 1990
An instrument for self-analysis of creative problem-solving style is introduced. A circular flow model of dynamic tension establishes a profile based on one's orientation toward generation, conceptualization, implementation, and optimization of knowledge. Preliminary tests with 130 businesspeople and undergraduate students indicate high…
Descriptors: Adults, Cognitive Style, Creative Thinking, Creativity
Peer reviewedSelby, Edwin C.; And Others – Journal of Creative Behavior, 1993
Innovative or adaptive behavior of 86 eighth-grade students was rated by themselves, parents, and teachers using the Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory. The inventory was found to be reliable, stable, and valid. No significant differences between male and female students' scores were exhibited. Correlation with scores on the Comprehensive Test…
Descriptors: Adjustment (to Environment), Adoption (Ideas), Basic Skills, Correlation

Direct link
