Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Computer Assisted Testing | 2 |
| Test Validity | 2 |
| Achievement Tests | 1 |
| Alignment (Education) | 1 |
| Automation | 1 |
| Computer System Design | 1 |
| Design Preferences | 1 |
| Evidence | 1 |
| Exit Examinations | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Geography | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Assessment in Education:… | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Adult Education | 1 |
| High Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| United Kingdom (England) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Bejar, Isaac I. – Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 2011
Automated scoring of constructed responses is already operational in several testing programmes. However, as the methodology matures and the demand for the utilisation of constructed responses increases, the volume of automated scoring is likely to increase at a fast pace. Quality assurance and control of the scoring process will likely be more…
Descriptors: Evidence, Quality Control, Scoring, Quality Assurance
Ahmed, Ayesha; Pollitt, Alastair – Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 2010
The two most common models for assessment involve measuring "how well" students perform on a task (the "quality model"), and "how difficult" a task students can succeed on (the "difficulty model"). By exploiting the interactive potential of computers we may be able to use a third model: measuring "how…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Computer Assisted Testing, Student Needs, Test Validity

Peer reviewed
Direct link
