NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 12 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Messick, Samuel – American Psychologist, 1995
Presents a comprehensive review of validity that includes an empirical evaluation of the actual and potential consequences of score interpretation and use, how those consequences come about, and what determines them. Six distinguishable aspects of construct validity are highlighted as a means of addressing central issues implicit in the notion of…
Descriptors: Concurrent Validity, Construct Validity, Content Validity, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Messick, Samuel – Educational Researcher, 1989
Presents a unified concept of test validity that integrates both the scientific and ethical considerations of test interpretation and use. Argues that the appropriateness, meaningfulness, and usefulness of score-based inferences are inseparable, and that this integration is based on construct validity. (FMW)
Descriptors: Construct Validity, Ethics, Scores, Social Influences
Messick, Samuel – 1996
The concept of "washback," especially prominent in the field of applied linguistics, refers to the extent to which a test influences teachers and learners to do things they would not otherwise necessarily do. Some writers invoke the notion of washback validity, holding that a test's validity should be gauged by the degree to which it has…
Descriptors: Applied Linguistics, Construct Validity, Criteria, Language Tests
Messick, Samuel; Anderson, Scarvia – 1970
Recent harsh criticisms that educational and psychological tests are unfair and inadequate measures of the capabilities of minority, poverty, and other educationally alienated groups are discussed. The authors suggest that there are two main issues, the first scientific, the second ethical: (1) Is a test a valid measure of the characteristics it…
Descriptors: Cultural Differences, Culture Fair Tests, Disadvantaged Youth, Individual Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Messick, Samuel – American Psychologist, 1980
Discusses evaluation of tests both in terms of their measurement properties and their potential social consequences. Presents a model for evaluating test validity based on empirical evidence as well as on ethical decisions. Stresses the importance of construct validity as a rational foundation for test predictiveness and relevance; and the…
Descriptors: Educational Diagnosis, Educational Testing, Ethics, Psychological Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Messick, Samuel – Educational Researcher, 1981
Argues for appraising tests for evidence of construct validity as well as evaluating the potential social consequences of test use. Asserts that construct validity provides a rational approach for predictive hypotheses and a rational basis for judgment of test relevance to the criterion domain. (Author/JCD)
Descriptors: Ethics, Evaluation Criteria, Scores, Test Construction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Messick, Samuel; Anderson, Scarvia – Counseling Psychologist, 1970
This article is a response to an article in a previous issue by Robert L. Williams on unfairness in testing blacks with existing instruments. This paper discusses: (1) testing as systematic inquiry; (2) the question of bias; (3) test use; and (4) the consequences of not testing. (CJ)
Descriptors: Disadvantaged, Educational Testing, Individual Development, Measurement Instruments
Messick, Samuel – 1992
Authentic and direct assessments of performances and products are conceptualized in terms of multiple distinctions having implications for validation. These include contrasts between performances and products, between assessment of performance per se and performance assessment of competence or other constructs, between structured and unstructured…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Competence, Educational Assessment, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Messick, Samuel – American Psychologist, 1975
Argues that even for purposes of applied decision making, reliance upon criterion validity -- the degree to which measures correlate with specific criteria -- or content coverage is not enough, that the meaning of the measure must also be analyzed in order to evaluate responsibly the possible consequences of the proposed use, it is stated.…
Descriptors: Educational Diagnosis, Educational Objectives, Educational Programs, Item Sampling
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Messick, Samuel; Barrows, Thomas S. – Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 1972
Questions arising in research and evaluation are more complicated in the area of early childhood education because of the vagaries of measurement with very young children and the occurrence of rapid changes during the early years. (Authors/MB)
Descriptors: Early Childhood Education, Educational Research, Evaluation Criteria, Information Sources
Messick, Samuel – New Directions for Testing and Measurement, 1981
In an attempt to reinforce the directive role of evidence in current arguments over test coaching, this chapter summarizes research findings from studies of coaching for the Scholastic Aptitude Test in the context of a conceptual analysis of the meaning and likely import of the coachability of such ability tests. (Author/BW)
Descriptors: Academic Aptitude, Aptitude Tests, College Admission, College Entrance Examinations
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Messick, Samuel – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1984
Comprehensive assessment in context focuses on the processes and structures involved in subject matter competence as moderated in performance by personal and environmental influences. This article addresses in detail both the nature of developing competence and its measurement in terms of context-dependent task performance. (Author/EGS)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Achievement Tests, Cognitive Ability, Cognitive Development