Descriptor
| Scores | 3 |
| Test Interpretation | 3 |
| Test Use | 3 |
| Test Validity | 3 |
| Construct Validity | 2 |
| Ethics | 2 |
| Test Construction | 2 |
| Applied Linguistics | 1 |
| Criteria | 1 |
| Evaluation Criteria | 1 |
| Language Tests | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Educational Researcher | 2 |
Author
| Messick, Samuel | 3 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedMessick, Samuel – Educational Researcher, 1981
Argues for appraising tests for evidence of construct validity as well as evaluating the potential social consequences of test use. Asserts that construct validity provides a rational approach for predictive hypotheses and a rational basis for judgment of test relevance to the criterion domain. (Author/JCD)
Descriptors: Ethics, Evaluation Criteria, Scores, Test Construction
Peer reviewedMessick, Samuel – Educational Researcher, 1989
Presents a unified concept of test validity that integrates both the scientific and ethical considerations of test interpretation and use. Argues that the appropriateness, meaningfulness, and usefulness of score-based inferences are inseparable, and that this integration is based on construct validity. (FMW)
Descriptors: Construct Validity, Ethics, Scores, Social Influences
Messick, Samuel – 1996
The concept of "washback," especially prominent in the field of applied linguistics, refers to the extent to which a test influences teachers and learners to do things they would not otherwise necessarily do. Some writers invoke the notion of washback validity, holding that a test's validity should be gauged by the degree to which it has…
Descriptors: Applied Linguistics, Construct Validity, Criteria, Language Tests


