Descriptor
| Child Abuse | 2 |
| Predictive Measurement | 2 |
| Test Validity | 2 |
| Classification | 1 |
| High Risk Persons | 1 |
| Identification | 1 |
| Predictive Validity | 1 |
| Psychological Patterns | 1 |
| Reliability | 1 |
| Response Style (Tests) | 1 |
| Screening Tests | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Child Abuse Potential… | 2 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedMilner, Joel S.; And Others – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1986
To provide cross-validation data for the Child Abuse Potential Inventory, classification rates were determined for 220 physical child abusers and matched control subjects. Using all protocols, a discriminant analysis indicated the Abuse scale correctly classified 85.4% of the subjects, with 82.7% of the abusers and 88.2% of the control subjects…
Descriptors: Child Abuse, Classification, High Risk Persons, Identification
Milner, Joel S.; Robertson, Kevin R. – Child Abuse and Neglect: The International Journal, 1989
A study examined the responses of 89 physical child abusers and 108 comparison subjects to the Child Abuse Potential Inventory to determine whether the inventory's response inconsistency scale could be used for screening for physical child abuse. The scale was rejected as a reliable or valid measure. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: Child Abuse, Predictive Measurement, Psychological Patterns, Reliability
