Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 5 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 12 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 33 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
| Lubin, Bernard | 2 |
| Oller, John W., Jr. | 2 |
| Abela, John | 1 |
| Abramowitz, Jonathan S. | 1 |
| Abubakar, Amina | 1 |
| Adkins, Dorothy C. | 1 |
| Agnello, Jessica | 1 |
| Alessandri, Guido | 1 |
| Allen, R. R. | 1 |
| Alterman, Arthur I. | 1 |
| Anastasi, Anne | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 8 |
| Researchers | 7 |
| Students | 4 |
| Teachers | 2 |
| Counselors | 1 |
Location
| Canada | 4 |
| Nebraska | 3 |
| United States | 3 |
| Australia | 2 |
| China | 2 |
| Taiwan | 2 |
| United Kingdom | 2 |
| Colombia | 1 |
| France | 1 |
| Hong Kong | 1 |
| Italy | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Education for All Handicapped… | 1 |
| Individuals with Disabilities… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedWalters, Glenn D. – Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 2001
Explores response styles and sets capable of altering a person's responses in the thinking portion of the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS). Constructs and incorporates into the PICTS validity scales to measure confusion and defensiveness. Results reveal that internal consistency, reliability, and validity of these two…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Correctional Rehabilitation, Criminals, Psychological Testing
Peer reviewedDavison, Mark L.; Kuang, Haijiang – School Psychology Quarterly, 2000
Reviews the articles in this issue of "School Psychology Quarterly" and briefly compares their methods for identifying profile patterns. Argues that subtest profile patterns on the existing generation of intelligence tests have modest reliability and weak relationships with achievement and diagnostic categorizations. (Contains 13…
Descriptors: Clinical Diagnosis, Intelligence Tests, Models, Profiles
Peer reviewedFaschingbauer, Thomas R. – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1974
The Faschingbauer Abbreviated Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (FAM) was developed using cluster analysis and was compared to the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) and other short forms. On code-type correspondence, configural classifications, profile validities, and scale elevations, the FAM compared favorably to a…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Evaluation, Personality Measures, Psychological Testing
Peer reviewedIannotti, Ronald J. – Counseling Psychologist, 1975
This paper presents a framework which may clarify differences in the definition of empathy, and examines various assessment techniques. In some instances inconsistencies were found between the conceptual and operational definitions. (Author)
Descriptors: Child Development, Children, Definitions, Empathy
Peer reviewedGordon, Michael E.; Gross, Ronald H. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1978
Past practice of operationalizing the concept of fakeability of psychological tests is reviewed. The strengths and weaknesses of these indices are discussed in the light of a proposed new definition of fakeability based upon Naylor's model of measurement accuracy. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Psychological Testing, Rating Scales, Response Style (Tests), Test Reliability
Peer reviewedKaestner, Elisabeth; Goldstein, Marvin – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1977
The Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire (16PF) was used to determine retest reliability (7-day interval) and motivational distortion for a sample of narcotic addicts (N=141) legally committed to treatment and tested by staff for routine diagnostic purposes. (Author)
Descriptors: Drug Addiction, Institutionalized Persons, Narcotics, Personality Assessment
Peer reviewedGoodge, Peter; Griffiths, Peter – Management Education and Development, 1985
This article addresses itself to the issue of accurate assessment techniques. The authors look at three assessment techniques--psychological tests, assessment centers and "biodata"--and compare them in terms of the information they provide, their accuracy, and ease of implementation. (Author/CT)
Descriptors: Assessment Centers (Personnel), Evaluation Methods, Information Sources, Program Effectiveness
Peer reviewedMcQuitty, Louis L. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1973
Paper analyzes additive variance in such a fashion that it supports both a theory of types and a cognitive-frustration theory of behavior in the development of tests designed to assess mental disturbance'' versus normality'' amongst college students. (Author)
Descriptors: Emotional Disturbances, Item Analysis, Psychological Testing, Tables (Data)
Sawyer, R. N. – Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance, 1971
This study investigated the reliability and validity of the Philosophical Belief Inventory (PBI). With the exception of the relationship between idealism and pragmatism and realism and existentialism, the PBI scales appear to be assessing independent facets of belief. (Author)
Descriptors: College Students, Counselors, Item Analysis, Psychological Testing
Peer reviewedMillimet, C. Raymond – Psychological Reports, 1970
Descriptors: Anxiety, Individual Characteristics, Personality Assessment, Personality Measures
Ford, Robert N.; and others – J Appl Psychol, 1969
Descriptors: College Environment, Comparative Testing, Employee Attitudes, Personality Theories
Treadwell, Yvonne – Psychol Rep, 1970
Descriptors: Ability, Cartoons, College Students, Creativity
Jacobs, Paul I.; Vandeventer, Mary – Psychol Rep, 1970
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Elementary School Students, Eskimos, Performance Factors
Peer reviewedVolentine, Susen Zimmerman – Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1981
Compared the MMPI Scale 5 to the Bem Sex Role Inventory and Personal Attributes Questionnaire. Femininity measures were related more strongly to Scale 5 score than masculinity measures. It was concluded that Scale 5 may be interpreted more accurately as a measure of femininity rather than masculinity/femininity. (Author)
Descriptors: Androgyny, Comparative Analysis, Females, Males
Peer reviewedPaolo, Anthony M.; Axelrod, Bradley N.; Troster, Alexander I. – Assessment, 1996
Eighty-seven normal older people were administered the Wisconsin Sorting Test on two occasions averaging over a year apart. There were average retest gains of 5 to 7 standard score points. The standard error of prediction, standard error of difference, and abnormal test-retest discrepancy scores were calculated for clinical use. (SLD)
Descriptors: Clinical Diagnosis, Diagnostic Tests, Error of Measurement, Older Adults


