Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Scoring Formulas | 6 |
| Standardized Tests | 6 |
| Test Reliability | 6 |
| Test Interpretation | 4 |
| Test Validity | 4 |
| Measurement Techniques | 3 |
| Scoring | 3 |
| Weighted Scores | 3 |
| Achievement Tests | 2 |
| Criterion Referenced Tests | 2 |
| Item Analysis | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Echternacht, Gary | 2 |
| Angoff, William H. | 1 |
| Gould, Jewell C. | 1 |
| Roudabush, Glenn E. | 1 |
| Schrader, William B. | 1 |
| Sophie Litschwartz | 1 |
| Ward, James G. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| New York | 1 |
| New York (New York) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| California Achievement Tests | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Sophie Litschwartz – Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2021
Background/Context: Pass/fail standardized exams frequently selectively rescore failing exams and retest failing examinees. This practice distorts the test score distribution and can confuse those who do analysis on these distributions. In 2011, the Wall Street Journal showed large discontinuities in the New York City Regent test score…
Descriptors: Standardized Tests, Pass Fail Grading, Scoring Rubrics, Scoring Formulas
Peer reviewedAngoff, William H.; Schrader, William B. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1984
The reported data provide a basis for evaluating the formula-scoring versus rights-scoring issue and for assessing the effects of directions on the reliability and parallelism of scores for sophisticated examinees taking professionally developed tests. Results support the invariance hypothesis rather than the differential effects hypothesis.…
Descriptors: College Entrance Examinations, Guessing (Tests), Higher Education, Hypothesis Testing
Echternacht, Gary – 1973
Estimates for the variance of empirically determined scoring weights are given. It is shown that test item writers should write distractors that discriminate on the criterion variable when this type of scoring is used. (Author)
Descriptors: Item Analysis, Measurement Techniques, Multiple Choice Tests, Performance Criteria
Ward, James G.; Gould, Jewell C. – 1980
This handbook, in two parts, constitutes a manual prepared by the American Federation of Teachers, for improving teachers' use of standardized tests. Part I outlines basic concepts and issues surrounding standardized testing for teachers, parents and school administrators. The terms norm-referenced tests, criterion referenced tests, minimum…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Aptitude Tests, Criterion Referenced Tests, Elementary Secondary Education
Echternacht, Gary – 1973
This study compares various item option scoring methods with respect to coefficient alpha and a concurrent validity coefficient. The scoring methods under consideration were: (1) formula scoring, (2) a priori scoring, (3) empirical scoring with an internal criterion, and (4) two modifications of formula scoring. The study indicates a clear…
Descriptors: Item Analysis, Measurement Techniques, Multiple Choice Tests, Performance Criteria
Roudabush, Glenn E. – 1975
The objective of this study was to show that standardized reading scores could be adequately estimated from scores on a criterion-referenced test in reading. This would reduce classroom test time, while, at the same time, provide the kinds of information teachers need to guide instruction, and the kinds of information administrators require for…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Correlation, Criterion Referenced Tests, Equated Scores

Direct link
