Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Content Validity | 2 |
| Reading Instruction | 2 |
| Test Reliability | 2 |
| Classification | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Construct Validity | 1 |
| English (Second Language) | 1 |
| Factor Analysis | 1 |
| Factor Structure | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| International Journal of… | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Turkey | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textKosar, Gulten; Akbana, Yunus Emre; Yakar, Levent – International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 2022
Reading self-efficacy performs a fundamental role in gaining academic achievement in college education. Review of the related literature unveils that it needs to be enriched by conducting further research on college students' reading self-efficacy. The paucity of investigations into college students' reading self-efficacy could have a connection…
Descriptors: College Students, Student Evaluation, Reading Tests, Test Construction
Melnick, Steven A.; Henk, William A. – 1997
This paper compares two methods of establishing content validity, forced-choice judgmental review and a latent category judgmental review. It also compares content validity evidence with the results of a scale reliability analysis and makes recommendations of the two content validity procedures. Two different groups of graduate students enrolled…
Descriptors: Classification, Comparative Analysis, Content Validity, Graduate Students
