Descriptor
| College Entrance Examinations | 2 |
| Guessing (Tests) | 2 |
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Hypothesis Testing | 2 |
| Scoring Formulas | 2 |
| Secondary Education | 2 |
| Test Reliability | 2 |
| Data Interpretation | 1 |
| Fatigue (Biology) | 1 |
| High School Students | 1 |
| Psychometrics | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Educational… | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Graduate Management Admission… | 1 |
| SAT (College Admission Test) | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedAngoff, William H.; Schrader, William B. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1984
The reported data provide a basis for evaluating the formula-scoring versus rights-scoring issue and for assessing the effects of directions on the reliability and parallelism of scores for sophisticated examinees taking professionally developed tests. Results support the invariance hypothesis rather than the differential effects hypothesis.…
Descriptors: College Entrance Examinations, Guessing (Tests), Higher Education, Hypothesis Testing
Download full textAlbanese, Mark A. – 1985
This study reexamines results reported by Angoff and Schrader regarding formula directions and rights directions for standardized tests. In that study, it was concluded that the two scoring directions were essentially equivalent. In this study, methodological concerns are discussed and additional data analyses undertaken. Among various…
Descriptors: College Entrance Examinations, Data Interpretation, Fatigue (Biology), Guessing (Tests)
